Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
Users online: 2648 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (1,933 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded88    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents    
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 82  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 330-332

Verrucous oral focal mucinosis

Department of Dermatology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication6-Apr-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kinjal Deepak Rambhia
B-105, Kalpataru Classic, Chincholi Bunder Road, Malad West, Mumbai - 400 064, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.174384

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Rambhia KD, Khopkar US. Verrucous oral focal mucinosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2016;82:330-2

How to cite this URL:
Rambhia KD, Khopkar US. Verrucous oral focal mucinosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 Jan 24];82:330-2. Available from:


A 60-year-old woman presented with an asymptomatic verrucous lesion on the right buccal mucosa that had grown slowly over the past 6 months. There was no history of bleeding from the lesion. The patient was a tobacco-chewer for many years. On examination, there was a cluster of verrucous papules coalesced to form a finger-like projection [Figure 1]. The lesion was grayish-white, firm, non-tender and there was no bleeding to touch. The underlying and surrounding mucosa appeared normal. There was no cervical lymphadenopathy. General and systemic examinations were within normal limits.
Figure 1: Clustered verrucous papules coalescing to form a plaque with finger-like projections

Click here to view

Biopsy from the lesion revealed a sub-epithelial, localized non-encapsulated area of loose myxomatous connective tissue stroma with stellate-shaped fibroblasts [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. The overlying epidermis showed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis and papillomatosis. Alcian blue stain revealed blue staining in the areas of prominent mucin deposition [Figure 4]. After clinico-pathological correlation, a diagnosis of verrucous focal mucinosis was made. The lesion was excised surgically.
Figure 2: Papillomatous projection with sub-epithelial bluish material (H and E, ×100)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Subepithelial mucin deposition (H and E, ×400)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Mucin deposition (Alcian blue, ×100)

Click here to view

Oral focal mucinosis is a rare, benign condition of unknown etiology. The first description was given by Tomich (1974) who reported eight such cases as the oral counterpart of cutaneous focal mucinosis.[1] It has been postulated that idiopathic focal hyperproduction of hyaluronic acid from the fibroblasts contributes to the pathogenesis. Oral focal mucinosis occurs primarily in adult patients and has a female preponderance. Oral mucosa overlying the bone such as gingiva and hard palate are most frequently involved, the next common areas of occurrence are buccal mucosa and tongue.[2] The classical clinical presentation of the lesion is as an asymptomatic, soft to firm, sessile or pedunculated mass with a smooth surface. The color of the lesion is the same as that of surrounding normal mucosa. It is most often mistaken for fibroma, pyogenic granuloma or mucocele. A smooth and non-ulcerated surface is the differentiating feature; however, a pebbled and lobulated surface has also been described.[2] In this case, the lesion was verrucous with grayish-white clusters of firm papules and normal surrounding mucosa. Clinical differential diagnoses of verrucous oral lesions include oral papilloma, verruca vulgaris, proliferating verrucous leukoplakia, verruciform xanthoma, verrucous carcinoma and papillary squamous cell carcinoma.[3] In the absence of distinct and specific clinical features, diagnosis is based on histopathology.

Oral papilloma and verruca vulgaris are characterized by hypergranulosis and koilocytes on biopsy. Proliferating verrucous leukoplakia presents with a hyperplastic epidermis and dysplasia. Verrucous carcinomas are locally aggressive low-grade malignancies with, koilocytes, individual cell keratinization and squamous pearl formation.[4] Papillary squamous cell carcinomas show large atypical cells with mitotic figures involving the entire epidermis. Histopathologically, verruciform xanthoma is characterized by foamy histiocytes in the papillary dermis. Oral focal mucinosis is characterized by a localized, sub-epithelial, non-encapsulated area of loose, myxomatous connective tissue encircled by normal collagen bundles. The myxomatous areas show minimal to absent reticulin fibers and fragmented collagen fibers replaced by mucin.[5] There are delicate fibrillary processes extending from the fibroblast cytoplasm. In superficial lesions, there is secondary atrophy of the epidermis with loss of rete ridges. In our patient, there was hyperkeratosis and papillomatosis overlying the sub-epithelial areas of localized mucin deposition which differs from previous reports. The histopathological differential diagnoses include soft-tissue myxoma, myxomatous change in fibrous lesions, nerve sheath myxoma and mucous retention phenomenon.[5] A sharp delineation and paucity of reticulin fibers differentiate oral focal mucinosis from soft tissue myxoma and myxomatous changes in fibrous lesions. Nerve sheath myxoma can be recognized by the presence of mast cells and a conspicuously lobular architecture. The mucous retention phenomenon or mucous retention cyst shows a circumscribed cavity containing mucoid material. The composition of the cavity is variable; it is formed by a lining of flattened cuboidal or columnar epithelial cells of the salivary gland duct in mucous retention cyst or compressed fibrous connective tissue or granulation tissue in mucous extravasation cyst. Infiltration by leukocytes and mononuclear phagocytes may be seen. In cases with atypical clinical features, histopathology helps to arrive at the correct diagnosis. The lesion is treated by surgical excision and has no tendency to recur.[6]

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Tomich CE. Oral focal mucinosis: A clinico pathologic and histochemical study of eight cases. Oral Surg 1974;38:714-24.  Back to cited text no. 1
Madhusudhan AS, Nagarajappa D, Manjunatha BS, Swati S, Charan Babu HS. Oral focal mucinosis: Report of two cases. Rev Odonto Cienc 2010;25:310-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
Swetha P, Supriya NA, Kumar GR. Characterization of different verrucous mucosal lesions. Indian J Dent Res 2013;24:642-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Terada T. Verrucous carcinoma of the oral cavity: A histopathologic study of 10 Japanese cases. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2011;10:148-51.  Back to cited text no. 4
Ena S, Nadella M, Chatterjee A, Ramesh A. Oral focal mucinosis: A rare case report of two cases. Ethiop J Health Sci 2013;23:178-82.  Back to cited text no. 5
Bharti V, Singh J. Oral focal mucinosis of palatal mucosa: A rare case report. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:214-8.  Back to cited text no. 6


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]


Print this article  Email this article


Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow