Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
Users online: 259 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (320 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded201    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents    
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 78  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 367-368

Occlusion, urine and genital lichen sclerosus

Department of Dermatology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication30-Apr-2012

Correspondence Address:
Christopher B Bunker
Department of Dermatology, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2BU
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.95461

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Bunker CB. Occlusion, urine and genital lichen sclerosus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2012;78:367-8

How to cite this URL:
Bunker CB. Occlusion, urine and genital lichen sclerosus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 Nov 24];78:367-8. Available from:


I congratulate my friends and colleagues, Drs. Gupta, Malhotra and Ajith on their perspicacious observations concerning the distribution of genital lichen sclerosus (GLSc), recently published in your journal. [1] I also applaud the clarity of their interpretation, with which I unequivocally agree, that occlusion of susceptible skin is central to the pathogenesis of this cryptic but important dermatosis. My own view is that it is occlusion specifically with urine that is key. May I have your permission, Sir, to paraphrase here from letters from myself that have appeared in the urology literature over the last couple of years about this theory? [2],[3]

In the male (M), GLSc affects principally the uncircumcised only rarely occurring in those who were circumcised at birth, where it is associated with trauma, instrumentation, genital jewellery (piercing) and gross anatomical abnormalities such as hypospadias and its surgical repair, [4] situations that can create urinary leakage. In girls, GLSc can be self-limiting, perhaps because tighter control of continence is acquired with aging (R. U. Sidwell-personal communication). In the adult female GLSc classically causes characteristic perianal disease [5] and has been associated with incontinence in women in a single report. [6] But GLSc never normally causes perianal disease in men because in striking contradistinction to women the male perineum is never normally chronically exposed to urinary irritation. However, MGLSc occurs and recurs in grafts. [4],[7]

Arguably, the arrangement of the distal urethra, navicular fossa and meatus has evolved to function as a low-pressure valve. The embryology is complicated and a wide, albeit often subtle, variation in naviculomeatal valve structure and function, and the relationships of both to striking variation in the structure and function of the prepuce, is revealed by meticulous clinical assessment. Many men presenting with GLSc will confess to dribbling after voiding and have abnormal naviculomeatal morphology on close examination. In these men, urine dribbling from the meatus after the prepuce has been replaced following voiding will spread widely between the juxtaposed mucosal surfaces. Occlusion and the phenomenon of koebnerization create the inflammation. [8] Our magnetic resonance spectroscopy work suggests that there is not one single indictable component of urine. [9]

Female GLSc seems to spare non-cornified stratified squamous epithelium. Women do not get urethral disease, [5] but this can be a devastating complication in men. Perhaps this is because, in the male, susceptibility to the irritant effects of urine may be due to variability in the epithelialization of the mucosa of the distal urethra and navicular fossa, as well as dysfunction of the naviculomeatal valve. The definition of mucosa is controversial but undoubtedly the proximal penile urethra possesses a true mucosa, while the circumcised glans certainly does not, the uncircumcised glans and inner prepuce might not, and the outer prepuce most likely does not. There are transition zones between true urothelium and true skin. Just as there is wide variability in the size and shape of the navicular fossa, there is probably variability in the site of the epithelial transition zones, the degree of keratinization of the glans, the length and, thus, surface area of the foreskin, and the disposition of adnexae. Perhaps urethral LSc eventuates because the transition to stratified keratinizing squamous epithelium occurs and/or urethral mucus glands are lost, too proximally, thus rendering the epithelium focally susceptible to the pernicious irritant effects of urine. Some recent histological findings may be pertinent to this argument. [10] Non-genital and especially true mucosal, e.g., buccal, skin grafts are held to be more successful than genital skin grafts in the repair of MGLSc. [11],[12]

The clinical observations of Gupta and his colleagues help us considerably in better understanding the pathogenesis of GLSc. Enlightenment in this regard is directly relevant to prevention or early diagnosis and medical and surgical treatment of the potentially catastrophic condition that is MGLSc. For example, surgical management of complicated GLSc must be designed so as not further to compromise naviculomeatal competence.

  References Top

1.Gupta S, Malhotra AK, Ajith C. Lichen sclerosus: Role of occlusion of the genital skin in the pathogenesis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2010;76:56-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Bunker CB, Edmonds E, Hawkins D, Francis N, Dinneen M. Re: Lichen sclerosus: Review of the literature and current recommendations for management: J. M. Pugliese, A. F. Morey and A. C. Peterson J Urol 2007;178:2268-2276. J Urol 2009;181:1802-3.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Bunker CB. Re: Sanjay Kulkarni, Guido Barbagli, Deepak Kirpekar, et al. Lichen sclerosus of the male genitalia and urethra: Surgical options and results in a multicenter international experience with 215 patients. Eur Urol 2009;55:945-6. Eur Urol 2010;58:e55-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Bunker CB, Neill SA. The genital, perianal and umbilical regions. In: Rook's Textbook of Dermatology. 7 th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 71.20-23.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Bunker CB, Neill SA. The genital, perianal and umbilical regions. In: Rook's Textbook of Dermatology. 7 th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 71.62-65.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Owen CM, Yell JA. Genital lichen sclerosus associated with incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:209-10.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Abdelbaky AM, Aluru P, Keegan P, Greene DR. Development of male genital lichen sclerosus in penile reconstruction skin grafts after cancer surgery: An unreported complication. BJU Int 2011. [In press]  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Weigand DA. Microscopic features of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in acrochordons: A clue to the cause of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus? J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28:751.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Edmonds EV, Bunker CB. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of urine in male genital lichen sclerosus. Br J Dermatol 2010;163:1355-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Kulkarni S, Barbagli G, Kirpekar D, Mirri F, Lazzeri M. Lichen sclerosus of the male genitalia and urethra: Surgical options and results in a multicenter international experience with 215 patients. Eur Urol 2009;55:945-56.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol 1998;81:735-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Bracka A. Re: Urethroplasty with abdominal skin grafts for long segment urethral strictures. J Urol 2010;183:1880-4. J Urol 2011;185:1985-6.  Back to cited text no. 12

This article has been cited by
1 Evidence-based (S3) Guideline on (anogenital) Lichen sclerosus
G. Kirtschig,K. Becker,A. Günthert,D. Jasaitiene,S. Cooper,C.-C. Chi,A. Kreuter,K.K. Rall,W. Aberer,S. Riechardt,F. Casabona,J. Powell,F. Brackenbury,R. Erdmann,M. Lazzeri,G. Barbagli,F. Wojnarowska
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2015; 29(10): e1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Lichen sclerosus associated with perineal urethrostomy
T.N. Shim,D.E. Andrich,A.R. Mundy,C.B. Bunker
British Journal of Dermatology. 2014; 170(1): 222
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Atopy, the barrier, urine and genital lichen sclerosus
C.B. Bunker
British Journal of Dermatology. 2013; 169(4): 953
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Differential gene hypermethylation in genital lichen sclerosus and cancer: a comparative study
David Guerrero-Setas,Noemí Pérez-Janices,Amaya Ojer,Laura Blanco-Fernandez,Carmen Guarch-Troyas,Rosa Guarch
Histopathology. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article


Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow