Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
Users online: 2912 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (97 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded364    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2007  |  Volume : 73  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 195-196

Clinical spectrum of dermatoses caused by cosmetics in south India: High prevalence of kumkum dermatitis

Department of Dermatology and STD, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India

Correspondence Address:
Devinder Mohan Thappa
Department of Dermatology and STD, JIPMER, Pondicherry
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.32748

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Nath AK, Thappa DM. Clinical spectrum of dermatoses caused by cosmetics in south India: High prevalence of kumkum dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007;73:195-6

How to cite this URL:
Nath AK, Thappa DM. Clinical spectrum of dermatoses caused by cosmetics in south India: High prevalence of kumkum dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2007 [cited 2020 Nov 23];73:195-6. Available from:


Cosmetics are defined as "articles intended to be rubbed, poured, sprayed on or sprinkled, introduced into or otherwise applied to the human body or any part thereof for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness or altering the appearance". [1] Adverse cutaneous reactions to cosmetics can be of various types. [2]

A descriptive study was conducted in the department of Dermatology and STD, in a tertiary care centre in south India from August 2004 to June 2006 to estimate the frequency of dermatoses caused by cosmetics in patients attending dermatology OPD and to clinically characterize various types of dermatoses caused by cosmetics.

Seventy-one patients with various types of cosmetic dermatoses were seen. Mean age of the patients was 42.9 years with female to male ratio of 1.6:1. Kumkum alone was the responsible cosmetic product in 41 patients (57.7%). Sticker bindi alone was incriminated in eight patients (11.3%), kumkum and sticker bindi both in five patients (7%), hair dye in eight patients (11.3%), lightening creams in four patients (5.6%) and after-shave lotion, nail polish, moisturizing cream, tilak and toothpaste in one patient each. Face was involved in 69 patients (97.1%), scalp and neck were involved in eight patients each (11.3%), abdomen in five patients (7%) and infra-axillary area in one patient (1.4%). Most common type of cosmetic dermatosis was pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD) (40 cases), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) (24 cases), leukoderma seen in nine patients, hypopigmentation seen in two patients and acneiform eruptions seen in one patient.

Cosmetic products most commonly incriminated for dermatitis are different in different countries and the pattern of dermatitis is determined by the way local populations use the cosmetic products. [3] According to Pasricha, [4] most common cause of contact dermatitis due to cosmetics in India is hair dye. Mehta et al [5] suspected sticker bindi , hair dye and face creams to be the most common causes in that order of frequency. Kumar et al [6] reported face creams as the most common (30%) cause of cosmetic dermatitis, followed by hair dye (16%) and soaps (14%).

Particular cosmetics, such as kumkum, bindi, tilak , are applied in India and a few other countries among the Hindus. [5] Hence, dermatitis due to these products are reported only in Indians. [4],[5] In our study, kumkum was the most common cause of cosmetic dermatoses (46/71 patients, 64.7%). Typically, kumkum is used by women of Indian origin (especially the Hindus). [4],[7],[8] But, in our study, males were also involved by kumkum dermatitis in significant proportion (16/46, 34.8%). They were using kumkum for religious purposes. In south Indian states ' kumkum ' is prepared at home by alkalizing pure turmeric powder [4] but commercial kumkum is used more often nowadays. The exact composition of commercially available kumkum is not known, but is known to contain starch or chalk powder colored with various azodyes. [8] Other known components in commercial kumkum include various dyes (coal tar dyes, toluidine red, erythrosine and lithol red calcium salt), [2] fragrances, groundnut oil, tragacanth gum, turmeric powder, parabens, [9] and canaga oil. [7]

The bindi spot is traditionally worn only by married Hindu women, but it is now regarded as a fashion accessory and is worn by unmarried women and even by non-Hindus. The spot may be painted on the skin or a plastic disc secured with adhesive may be used. [10] Contact dermatitis can develop to them depending upon the material used to make the bindi mark. Adhesive material in sticker bindi is also known to produce contact dermatitis. [11],[12] Another unique product used by the Hindus is tilak, which is either chandan - powdered dry wood of the sandal tree ( Santalum alba ) or ash. [4]

According to an Indian study by Dogra et al , [13] the commonest type of cosmetic dermatosis was contact allergic dermatitis (29/49 cases, 59.2%), followed by contact irritant dermatitis (15 cases), hyperpigmentation (eight cases), hypopigmentation (six cases), contact urticaria (five cases), acneiform eruptions (four cases), hair breakage (two cases) and nail breakage (one case). The most common type of cosmetic dermatosis seen in our study was pigmented contact dermatitis (40/71 patients).

The term 'pigmented contact dermatitis' was introduced by Osmundsen in 1970 to explain the pigmentation which followed contact dermatitis. However, the dermatitis may not be clinically overt and hyper pigmentation can be the only visible manifestation of a contact allergy. [14] Kumkum is emerging as an important cause of pigmented contact dermatitis in recent reports. [8],[10]

  References Top

1.Engasser PG, Maibach HI. Cosmetics and skin care in dermatology practice. In : Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, editors. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6 th ed. McGraw-Hill; New York; 2003. p. 2369-79.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Mehta SS, Reddy BS. Cosmetic dermatitis-current perspectives. Int J Dermatol 2003;42:533-42.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Gomez Vαzquez M, Fernαndez-Redondo V, Toribio J. Allergic contact eczema/ dermatitis from cosmetics. Allergy 2002;57:268-9.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Pasricha JS. Contact Dermatitis in India. 2 nd ed. The Offsetters: New Delhi; 1988. p. 67-85.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Mehta SS, Reddy BS. Pattern of cosmetic sensitivity in Indian patients. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45:292-3.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Kumar P, Paulose R. Cosmetic dermatitis in an Indian city. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:114-5.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Kumar JV, Moideen R, Murugesh SB. Contactants in 'Kum-Kum' dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1996;62:220-1.  Back to cited text no. 7    Medknow Journal  
8.Kumar AS, Pandhi RK, Bhutani LK. Bindi dermatoses. Int J Dermatol 1986;25:434-5.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Goh CL, Kozuka T. Pigmented contact dermatitis from 'kumkum'. Clin Exp Dermatol 1986;11:603-6.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Dwyer CM, Forsyth A. Allergic contact dermatitis from bindi. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:174.  Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Dogra A, Dua A. Cosmetic dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol 2005;50:191-5.   Back to cited text no. 11      
12.Baxter KF, Wilkinson SM. Contact dermatitis from a nickel-containing bindi. Contact Dermatitis 2002;47:55.  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Dogra A, Minocha YC, Kaur S. Adverse reactions to cosmetics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:165-7.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
14.Osmundsen PE. Pigmented contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1970;83:296-301.  Back to cited text no. 14      

This article has been cited by
1 Patch Testing in Suspected Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Cosmetics
Pramod Kumar,Rekha Paulose
Dermatology Research and Practice. 2014; 2014: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Vermilion hypopigmentation at an unusual site
Murugusundram Sundaram
Contact Dermatitis. 2010; 62(1): 58-59
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article


Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow