Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
Users online: 3302 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
    Next article
    Previous article
    Table of Contents

    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded21    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal


Year : 1987  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 103--107

Contact Dermatitis of Hands in Chandigarh

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 28145311

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Sixty four patients (40 males, 24females) of contact dermatitis of hands were patch tested. The patients included housewives (22), factory workers (16), office workers (8), medical and para - medical personnel (8), building workers (3), teachers (4), and photographer, farmer and student one each. The substances tested included battery of metals, rubber chemicals, common medicaments and suspected substances. Sensitivity to metals was found in 34 (53. 1%) patients and nickel, cobalt and chromate in 40.6, 31.2 and 21.8% patients respectively. Medicament, rubber and vegetable sensitivity was found in 26 (40.6%), 13 (20.3%) and 13 (20.3%) patients respectively. The miscellaneous sensitizers were positive in 15 (23.4%) patients. They included plants oils, file cover, currency notes, DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), PPD (paraphenylenediamine) formaldehyde, mercuric chloride, film and paper developer.


Print this article     Email this article

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow