IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 455 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Ahead Of Print
   Article in PDF
   
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed141    
    PDF Downloaded12    

Recommend this journal

 

Previous Article Table of Contents Next Article  
ERRATA
Ahead of print schedule

Erratum: Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics



Date of Web Publication23-Oct-2017

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None




How to cite this URL:
. Erratum: Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=216935


In the article titled "Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics" published in pages 730-2, issue 6, vol. 83 of Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology[1], the sentence "The time kill combination of concentration-independent killing and prolonged PAFEs suggest that the 24th AUC/MIC parameter is most closely tied to treatment effect for triazoles." in the first paragraph under the heading "Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Systemic Antifungals" is written incorrectly. The correct sentence should read as "The time kill combination of concentration-independent killing and prolonged PAFEs suggest that the 24 AUC/MIC parameter is most closely tied to treatment effect for triazoles."

The sentences "Though TER was comparable to 200 mg/day ITR as an antidermatophyte drug, a dose of ITR of 200 mg twice a day had a faster onset of action than TER" and "This is because the levels achieved in the stratum corneum was the highest for daily FLU (66.4 μ(6gm) as compared to weekly FLU (23.4 ag/gm)" in the fi rst and second paragraphs under the heading "Clinical Relevance of Skin Pharmacology of Systemic Antifungals" are written incorrectly. The correct sentences should read as "Though TER (250 mg/day) was comparable to 200 mg/day ITR as an antidermatophyte drug, a dose of ITR of 200 mg twice a day had a faster onset of action than TER." and "This is because the levels achieved in the stratum corneum was the highest for daily FLU (66.4 μg/gm) as compared to weekly FLU (23.4 μg/gm)." respectively.

 
  References Top

1.
Sardana K, Arora P, Mahajan K. Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017;83:730-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous Article Next Article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow