IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 4110 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (2,906 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed422    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - STUDY LETTER
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 85  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 638-641

Early clinical and histological changes induced by microneedling in facial melasma: A pilot study


1 Department of Dermatology, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 Department of Dermatology and Radiotherapy, FMB-UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
3 Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Recife, PE, Brazil

Date of Web Publication11-Oct-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Daniel Pinho Cassiano
Rua Borges Lagoa, 508, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 04038-000
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_44_19

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Cassiano DP, Espósito AC, Hassun KM, Lima EV, Bagatin E, Miot HA. Early clinical and histological changes induced by microneedling in facial melasma: A pilot study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2019;85:638-41

How to cite this URL:
Cassiano DP, Espósito AC, Hassun KM, Lima EV, Bagatin E, Miot HA. Early clinical and histological changes induced by microneedling in facial melasma: A pilot study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 17];85:638-41. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2019/85/6/638/268636




Sir,

Melasma is a common, relapsing pigmentary disorder that has a major impact on the quality of life of the affected patients. Its pathology is heterogeneous, involving not only the epidermal layers but also upper dermal changes such as solar elastosis, collagen disruption, and basement membrane damage.[1] Gentle skin microneedling has been reported as a successful adjuvant approach for treating melasma. It decreases epidermal melanin density, produces epidermal thickening and restores the basement membrane and the upper dermal collagen.[2] However, the key role of microneedling in the improvement of melasma has not been thoroughly investigated, especially with respect to the associated histological changes.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the early histological changes caused by micro needling, as well as the clinical improvement: 7 days after a single session treatment for facial melasma.

We performed a quasi-experimental trial that enrolled 20 women with facial melasma who were evaluated at baseline (T0) and after 7 days of the treatment session (T7) through standardized photography (VISIA ; Canfield; Parsippany, NJ, USA), melasma quality of life questionnaire for brazilian portuguese language (MELASQoL-BP), and colorimetry. Quasi experimental trial = non random allocation. Ten first participants were allocated to the microneedling group and submitted to a biopsy (punch 3 mm) of the facial melasma lesions, followed by one session of 1.5mm micro needling (Dr. Roller ; Derma Rolling System; Gyeonggi Province, Korea) according to Lima protocol.[3] After 1 week, the microneedling group was subjected to a new biopsy. All participants used broad-spectrum sunscreen (Color SPF 50 Ideal Soleil ; Vichy). Skin samples were stained with periodic acid–Schiff, Fontana-Masson, and Herovici and marked with Ki67 immunohistochemistry. A blinded examiner analyzed the photographs and the histologic slides.

The two groups were comparable (P > 0.1) regarding age, skin phototype, pregnancies, sun exposure, and severity of melasma [Table 1]. Clinical severity assessed by modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), colorimetry, and quality of life parameters improved only in the microneedling group [Table 2]. There was a significant reduction in melanin density, pendulous melanocytes and basement membrane damage per histological field. In addition, microneedling induced slight epidermal hyperplasia, subepidermal deposition of extracellular substances (glycosaminoglicans and fibrin), fibroblast proliferation, and increase in Ki67 marked keratinocytes after 7 days [Table 3] and [Figure 1].
Table 1: Main clinical and demographic data of the cases (microneedling) and controls (n=20)

Click here to view
Table 2: Clinical changes, quality of life scores, and chromatometer measures from patients in the microneedling and control groups (n=20): intergroup and intragroup (T0×T7) assessment

Click here to view
Table 3: Histological and immunohistochemical changes of the microneedling group (n=10)

Click here to view
Figure 1:

Click here to view


This pilot study demonstrated that gentle microneedling promoted early changes in epidermis and upper dermis that led to reverse some structural patterns in melasma, substantiating its clinical improvement. The indications of microneedling are widening in dermatology, especially in inducing neocollagenesis.[4],[5] However, its effects on the epidermis regarding the increase in keratinocyte proliferation and basement membrane restoration have been rarely explored.

As micro needling causes little epidermal damage, it hastens skin recovery and limits the risks of infection, post inflammatory pigmentation and scarring, while stimulating upper dermal wound healing. There is fibroblast proliferation, fibronectin deposition, neocollagenesis, and the release of growth cytokines related to repair.[4] The restructuring of upper dermis, basement membrane and increase in epidermal turnover disfavor the contact of melanocytes with dermal released melanogenic stimuli like endothelins, stem-cell factor, and hepatocyte growth factor as well as promote an increase in the clearance of epidermal melanin.[2]

The main limitations of the study were the modest sample size and the short follow-up, which did not hinder the detection of changes. Further, randomized controlled studies comparing sunscreens, triple-combination agents, oral tranexamic acid and microneedling to explore the role of each treatment regimen in clinical and histological improvement of melasma is warranted.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

FAPESP (2018/10827-3).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Kwon SH, Hwang YJ, Lee SK, Park KC. Heterogeneous pathology of melasma and its clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17. pii: E824.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Lima EV, Lima MM, Paixão MP, Miot HA. Assessment of the effects of skin microneedling as adjuvant therapy for facial melasma: A pilot study. BMC Dermatol 2017;17:14.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lima Ede A. Microneedling in facial recalcitrant melasma: Report of a series of 22 cases. An Bras Dermatol 2015;90:919-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Alster TS, Graham PM. Microneedling: A review and practical guide. Dermatol Surg 2018;44:397-404.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cohen BE, Elbuluk N. Microneedling in skin of color: A review of uses and efficacy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;74:348-55.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow