IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 6383 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Article in PDF (266 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1195    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded90    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
ERRATA
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 84  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 387

Erratum: Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics



Date of Web Publication23-Oct-2017

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.216935

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
. Erratum: Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2018;84:387

How to cite this URL:
. Erratum: Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 1];84:387. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2018/84/3/387/216935


In the article titled “Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics” published in pages 730-2, issue 6, vol. 83 of Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology [1], the sentence “The time kill combination of concentration-independent killing and prolonged PAFEs suggest that the 24th AUC/MIC parameter is most closely tied to treatment effect for triazoles.” in the first paragraph under the heading “Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Systemic Antifungals” is written incorrectly. The correct sentence should read as “The time kill combination of concentration-independent killing and prolonged PAFEs suggest that the 24 AUC/MIC parameter is most closely tied to treatment effect for triazoles.”

The sentences “Though TER was comparable to 200 mg/day ITR as an antidermatophyte drug, a dose of ITR of 200 mg twice a day had a faster onset of action than TER” and “This is because the levels achieved in the stratum corneum was the highest for daily FLU (66.4 μ(6gm) as compared to weekly FLU (23.4 ag/gm)” in the first and second paragraphs under the heading “Clinical Relevance of Skin Pharmacology of Systemic Antifungals” are written incorrectly. The correct sentences should read as “Though TER (250 mg/day) was comparable to 200 mg/day ITR as an antidermatophyte drug, a dose of ITR of 200 mg twice a day had a faster onset of action than TER.” and “This is because the levels achieved in the stratum corneum was the highest for daily FLU (66.4 μg/gm) as compared to weekly FLU (23.4 μg/gm).” respectively.

 
  References Top

1.
Sardana K, Arora P, Mahajan K. Intracutaneous pharmacokinetics of oral antifungals and their relevance in recalcitrant cutaneous dermatophytosis: Time to revisit basics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017;83:730-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow