IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 237 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (1,126 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed888    
    Printed13    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - THERAPY LETTER
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 83  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 121-124

Nano-silver dressing in toxic epidermal necrolysis


Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Web Publication2-Dec-2016

Correspondence Address:
Shekhar Neema
Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.192955

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Neema S, Chatterjee M. Nano-silver dressing in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2017;83:121-4

How to cite this URL:
Neema S, Chatterjee M. Nano-silver dressing in toxic epidermal necrolysis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 23];83:121-4. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2017/83/1/121/192955


Sir,

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a potentially fatal adverse cutaneous drug reaction. Mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis depends on the severity of involvement. Score of toxic epidermal necrolysis (SCORTEN) is a validated scoring system for prognosis.[1] The most common causes of mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis are sepsis and respiratory failure.[2] The skin, with its barrier function impaired, is an obvious source of infection, resulting in sepsis in these cases. Source control is important to prevent the development of sepsis in these cases. We present a case of toxic epidermal necrolysis treated with nano-silver dressing for source control with excellent outcome.

A 47-year-old woman, being treated for trigeminal neuralgia with tablet carbamazepine 100 mg thrice daily for 2 weeks, presented with complaints of skin rash and fever of 3 days duration. General examination revealed pulse rate of 124/min and temperature of 100°F. Dermatological examination revealed involvement of approximately 70% of body surface area with vesiculobullous lesions and erosions [Figure 1]. Oral and vaginal mucosa showed erosions and crusting. Investigations on admission revealed polymorphonuclear leukocytosis, blood urea: 56 mg/dl, serum creatinine: 1.4 mg/dl, serum bicarbonate: 24 mmol/L and blood sugar: 186 mg/dl. The rest of the investigations, including chest X-ray, blood and urine culture, surface swab and culture was within normal limits. SCORTEN score on the day of admission and day 3 was assessed to be 4.
Figure 1: Widepread erosions

Click here to view


She was admitted to the burns ward and treated with intravenous immunoglobulin in a dose of 1 g/kg for 3 days along with supportive therapy. In view of the large body surface area involvement and high risk of sepsis, we decided to use nano-silver dressing for her skin care. As the skin swab and blood culture was negative, we did not use any empirical antibiotics. Nano-silver dressings were moistened with distilled water, applied on the skin and kept in place using cotton pad and crepe bandage [Figure 2]. These dressings were changed twice at an interval of 2 days. Re-epithelialization was noted on day 5 and complete healing of skin was noted on day 9 of admission [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. The patient became afebrile on day 4, ambulant on day 6 and was discharged on day 12 of admission.
Figure 2: Nano-silver dressing in situ with cotton pad and crepe bandage

Click here to view
Figure 3: Beginning of re-epithelialisation on day 5

Click here to view
Figure 4: Complete re-epithelialisation on day 9

Click here to view


Prevention of wound infection in toxic epidermal necrolysis remains a priority in management.[3] Silver has antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. It is biologically active in the soluble form and exerts an antimicrobial effect by blocking the cellular respiration of microorganisms, denaturing bacterial DNA and disrupting the cell membrane. Silver sulfadiazine was introduced in 1960 for the management of burn wounds and it reduced infections in burn wounds significantly. However, silver sulfadiazine cream has a short action, thus requiring frequent dressing change.[4] Use of nanotechnology in dressing leads to release clusters of extremely small and reactive silver particles. This results in a higher surface area of skin being in contact with the silver particles and better antimicrobial action.[5]

We used a proprietary three-layered dressing consisting of silver nanocrystals applied on rayon or polyester core (Acticoat ). This dressing needs to be moistened with sterile water before being placed on the wound. Moistening not only releases up to 100 parts per million of ionized silver, but also provides moistened environment for wound healing. This dressing releases thirty times less silver cations as compared to the other forms of silver as silver sulfadiazine; however, these silver cations are more effective and have the property of sustained release.[6]

Complete re-epithelialization takes approximately 23 days with steroids and 16.7 days with cyclosporine; however, in our case, re-epithelialization occured in 9 days and patient was discharged on day 12.[7] Cyclosporine is advantageous as compared to intravenous immunoglobulin; however, we used intravenous immunoglobulin because of fear of infection in our case.[8] Various dressings have been used for the management of affected skin in toxic epidermal necrolysis including biological dressings such as collagen sheets, amniotic membrane and homograft skin. Collagen sheets also prevent bacterial migration and improve wound healing, however, unlike silver dressing, these do not have an antimicrobial action.[9] Traditional dressings such as paraffin gauze do not have antimicrobial action and adhere to the wound surface, thus change of dressing results in de-epithelialization and is painful.

Use of nano-silver dressing prevents infection in toxic epidermal necrolysis which may lead to faster wound healing. In addition, it is a non-adhesive dressing and does not lead to denudation of skin during the change of dressing. As the dressing needs to be changed after 48–72 hrs, the pain and discomfort of change of dressing is reduced.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Bastuji-Garin S, Fouchard N, Bertocchi M, Roujeau JC, Revuz J, Wolkenstein P. SCORTEN: A severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol 2000;115:149-53.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Suwarsa O, Yuwita W, Dharmadji HP, Sutedja E. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, Indonesia from 2009-2013. Asia Pac Allergy 2016;6:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Daeschlein G. Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int Wound J 2013;10 Suppl 1:9-14.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hoffmann S. Silver sulfadiazine: An antibacterial agent for topical use in burns. A review of the literature. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:119-26.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Heggers J, Goodheart RE, Washington J, McCoy L, Carino E, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of three silver dressings in an infected animal model. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2005 Jan 1;26(1):53-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Fong J, Wood F. Nanocrystalline silver dressings in wound management: A review. Int J Nanomedicine 2006;1:441-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Singh GK, Chatterjee M, Verma R. Cyclosporine in Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis and retrospective comparison with systemic corticosteroid. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2013;79:686-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
8.
Kirchhof MG, Miliszewski MA, Sikora S, Papp A, Dutz JP. Retrospective review of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis treatment comparing intravenous immunoglobulin with cyclosporine. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;71:941-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bhattacharya S, Tripathi HN, Gupta V, Nigam B, Khanna A. Collagen sheet dressings for cutaneous lesions of toxic epidermal necrolysis. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:474-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow