|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 656
Superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis
Anirban Das, Anupam Das, Sabari Bhattacharya, Anupama Ghosh, Kaushik Shome
Department of Dermatology, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India
|Date of Web Publication||28-Oct-2015|
Dr. Anupam Das
“Prerana”, 19, Phoolbagan, Kolkata - 700 086, West Bengal
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Das A, Das A, Bhattacharya S, Ghosh A, Shome K. Superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:656
|How to cite this URL:|
Das A, Das A, Bhattacharya S, Ghosh A, Shome K. Superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Aug 14];81:656. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2015/81/6/656/158637
Bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma (BIE) was first described by Brocq in 1902., Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens is a milder variant of the condition, which is now designated as superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis. It is distinguished clinically from epidermolytic hyperkeratosis by the absence of erythroderma, localization of dark grey hyperkeratosis to the flexures, and areas of peeling of skin; known as the “Mauserung phenomenon”.
An 8-month-old boy, born of non-consanguinous parentage presented to us with generalized thickening of the skin. There was scaling over the trunk, extremities and face, the scales being accentuated over the flexural creases. Besides, some areas showed peeling of normal skin on the slightest pressure. The patient was born with normal, non-erythematous and non-scaly skin. There was no history of a restrictive membrane at birth. From the time the child was two months old, he had generalized erythema and blistering which ruptured easily with eventual thickening of the skin. This was followed by peeling of skin without any underlying erythema, and subsequent clearance. Lesions occurred over the entire skin sparing the palms and soles. The lesions occasionally became pruritic and he would scratch and peel them. After application of emollients, the hyperkeratotic skin would peel away and appear normal but the multiple recurrences prompted the parents to seek medical help.
Cutaneous examination revealed dark grey hyperkeratosis over the trunk, extremities and cheeks. There was no bulla when the child presented to us, however, there was a definite history of blistering. Hyperkeratosis was accentuated over the flexures and axillae, sparing the palms and soles [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. Hair, nails, mucosae and teeth were normal. “Mauserung” phenomenon could be elicited and there was peeling of the hyperkeratotic skin with underlying normal skin, in the absence of any erythema [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b. No one else in the family had a similar illness.
|Figure 1: (a) Dark grey hyperkeratosis over trunk. (b) Dark grey hyperkeratosis over extremities and cheeks|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: (a and b) Note the peeling of the hyperkeratotic skin
with underlying normal skin without any erythema (“Mauserung” phenomenon). Note the collarette of scales in the margins|
Click here to view
A biopsy from a lesion on the arm showed basket weave hyperkeratosis and thickening of the granular layer with vacuolar degeneration of keratinocytes in the spinous and granular layer. We made a provisional diagnosis of superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis (ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens) and treated the patient with topical emollients. Genetic studies could not be done due to lack of infrastructure and financial constraints.
Mutations in keratin genes are responsible for a wide range of disorders of keratinization. K1 and K10 are present in the suprabasal cells, and K2e is normally expressed in the upper spinous cells and granular cells. Bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma is caused due to mutations involving K1 and K10, whereas ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens occurs due to an underlying mutation in K2e.
Bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma typically presents with fragile skin (epidermolysis), which gives way to progressive hyperkeratosis. A mild, generalized erythroderma is present at birth. Flaccid blisters, peeling and superficial erosions at sites of minor trauma or friction are apparent within the first few hours of life. The superficial erosions heal rapidly without scarring, and easy blistering ceases in the first few months of life. Erythroderma fades away while the characteristic grey, waxy scale evolves. Increasing hyperkeratosis is obvious from early childhood and is most prominent around the anterior neck, flexures, abdominal wall, infragluteal folds and scalp. Yellow-brown, waxy, ridged or corrugated scale builds up in skin creases. The colour of the scales may vary from dark brown to grey or white. The hair, nails and mucosae are usually normal.
In contrast, superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis (ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens) is less severe, often without any abnormalities at birth. It is the result of mutation in the K2e gene located on 12q13.13. Blistering in response to trauma develops in infancy. Hyperkeratosis with dark brown skin is found predominantly over the flexures of limbs. A collarette-like lesion may be found where the uppermost epidermis has been lost, a finding noted in our patient. Superficial peeling of the skin ("Mauserung” phenomenon) is the diagnostic hallmark of superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis., The blistering and peeling generally improve with age. The hyperkeratosis may grow more severe but it remains localized to flexural folds. Rajiv et al. described a 14-year-old boy whose blistering improved with age but the problem of skin peeling increased. Koley et al. presented a case where there was no history or clinical evidence of blistering at the time of presentation. Salient points of difference between bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma and superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis (ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens) have been provided in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Salient points of difference between bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma and ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens|
Click here to view
The term “epidermolytic hyperkeratosis” is derived from the characteristic light microscopic observation of intracellular vacuolization, clumping of tonofilaments and formation of small intra-epidermal blisters, commonly seen in ichthyoses as a result of keratin mutations. Therefore the term ''epidermolytic hyperkeratosis” is used (by some) as synonymous with bullous ichthyosis, ichthyosis exfoliativa, bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma (of Brocq), or ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens. To simplify the nomenclature, Vinzenz et al., proposed the novel umbrella term of “keratinopathic ichthyosis” (KPI). They also proposed the novel disease name “superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis'' for the well-defined entity, ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens.
Direct sequencing of PCR products of keratin K2e shows a point mutation in the highly conserved helix termination motif. The diagnosis can be confirmed only by molecular genetic testing but clinical examination helps to differentiate bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma from superficial epidermolytic ichthyosis.
Antibiotics, emollients, mild keratolytic preparations and topical tazarotene  are good therapeutic options to offer and these are reliably known to lead to improvement.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Lacz NL, Schwartz RA, Kihiczak G. Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: A keratin 1 or 10 mutational event. Int J Dermatol 2005;44:1-6.
Judge MR, McLean WH, Munro CS. Disorders of Keratinisation. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, (editors). Rook's Textbook of dermatology. 8th
ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 19.34-6.
Basarab T, Smith FJ, Jolliffe VM, McLean WH, Neill S, Rustin MH. et al
. Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens: Report of a family with evidence of a keratin 2e mutation, and a review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 1999;140:689-95.
Sybert VP, Francis JS, Corden LD, Smith LT, Weaver M, Stephens K. et al
. Cyclic ichthyosis with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: A phenotype conferred by mutations in the 2B domain of keratin K1. Am J Hum Genet 1999;64:732-8.
Whittock NV, Ashton GH, Griffiths WA, Eady RA, McGrath JA. New mutations in keratin 1 that cause bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma and keratin 2e that cause ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:330-5.
Thappa DM, Jeevankumar B. Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens. Indian Pediatr 2003;40:265-6.
Rajiv S, Rakhesh SV. Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens: Response to topical tazarotene. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:43-6.
Koley S, Salodkar A, Gupta S, Bhanke A, Ujawane A, Shazia B. Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens sans history of blistering: An interesting case report. J Pakistan Assoc Dermatol 2009;19:171-4.
Oji V, Tadini G, Akiyama M, Bardon CB, Bodemer C, Bourrat E. et al
. Revised nomenclature and classification of inherited ichthyoses: Results of theFirst Ichthyosis Consensus Conference in Sore'ze 2009. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:607-41.
Ang-Tiu CU, Nicolas ME. Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens. J Dermatol Case Rep 2012;6:78-81.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]