IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 1243 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (563 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3284    
    Printed26    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded93    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - STUDY LETTER
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 81  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 608-610

Dermoscopy of aggressive basal cell carcinomas


Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Clinic of Dermatovenereology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Date of Web Publication28-Oct-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mirjana Popadic
Dermatovenereologist, Pasterova 2, Belgrade
Serbia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.168343

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Popadic M. Dermoscopy of aggressive basal cell carcinomas. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:608-10

How to cite this URL:
Popadic M. Dermoscopy of aggressive basal cell carcinomas. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 5];81:608-10. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2015/81/6/608/168343


Sir,

The histological subtype of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most important factor used to determine the best treatment modality. Although up to 26 histological subtypes of basal cell carcinoma have been identified, only three of these (nodular, superficial and aggressive) are relevant to determining the appropriate treatment choice.[1] Superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma, both usually demonstrate an indolent growth pattern and have a low-risk for incomplete treatment and recurrence. The third, a high-risk subtype, includes all basal cell carcinomas that exhibit aggressive-growth such as infiltrative, morpheaform, micronodular and basal cell carcinoma with squamous differentiation.[2] The “aggressive-growth” subtypes are characterized by an infiltrative growth pattern that has poor circumscription and tendency for perineural and perivascular invasion leading to difficulty in surgical eradication and consequent high recurrence rates.[2]

Early diagnosis and accurate treatment are essential to reduce morbidity and prevent recurrence/metastasis. Dermoscopic examination, by providing additional morphological information, can aid the clinical diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. However, the significance of dermoscopy in determining the aggressiveness of basal cell carcinoma remains to be elucidated.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the dermoscopic patterns of aggressive basal cell carcinoma and to investigate the possible role of dermoscopy in identifying the aggressive nature of the tumor.

Seven histopathologically proven aggressive basal cell carcinomas (4 morpheaform and 3 infiltrative) were identified and closely analyzed, using DermLite FOTO Equipment at 10-fold magnification.[3] Each aggressive tumor was evaluated for the presence of various dermoscopic features relevant for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. In mixed-type lesions, the superiority rule was applied according to the most unfavorable subtype: aggressive > nonaggressive. Almost all were primary tumors except one that was a recurrent basal cell carcinoma (infiltrative type).

Males were predominantly affected in both variants of aggressive tumors [Table 1]. Patients with infiltrative basal cell carcinoma were older (mean age 72 years; range 65–76 years) than patients with morpheaform basal cell carcinoma (mean age 66.5 years; range 51–78 years).
Table 1: Demographic, clinical and dermoscopic characteristic of aggressive basal cell carcinomas

Click here to view


All tumors were located in the head/neck region. Morpheaform basal cell carcinomas were larger (mean diameter 4.07 cm; range, 1.8–7 cm) than infiltrative basal cell carcinoma (mean diameter 2.9 cm; range, 1.2–4.5 cm), with a longer history of duration (78 months, range = 36–120 months), compared to infiltrative basal cell carcinomas (8.7 months, range = 2–12 months) [Table 1].

The most frequently detected features in morpheaform basal cell carcinoma were milky-red background and arborizing microvessels (4/4, 100%), followed by short fine telangiectasias (SFT), white areas and structureless hypopigmentation (3/4, 75%). Structureless hyperpigmentation, white lines and multiple erosions were rarer findings (2/4, 50%) [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].[3]
Figure 1: Morpheaform basal cell carcinoma. On dermoscopy, numerous arborizing telangiectatic vessels and areas of structureless hypo/hyperpigmentation are seen

Click here to view
Figure 2: Morpheaform basal cell carcinoma. On dermoscopy, a milky-red background, with arborizing telangiectatic vessels, short fine telangiectatic vessels, white lines, structureless hypopigmentation and multiple small erosions are seen

Click here to view


All three infiltrative basal cell carcinomas demonstrated multiple erosions and white areas (3/3, 100%). Arborizing vessels/microvessels, multiple blue-gray globules and structureless hyperpigmentation were found in 2 of 3 (66.7%) infiltrative basal cell carcinomas [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b.[3]
Figure 3: Infiltrative basal cell carcinomas. (a) Flat clinical presentation with typical dermoscopic features in thin tumors (milky-red background, short fine telangiectatic vessels) in combination with white structures. (b) Nodular clinical presentation: Numerous pigmented features with structureless hypo/hyperpigmentation are identified

Click here to view


Pyne et al., established that aggressive basal cell carcinoma tends to have no or less pink within the tumor area and absent or few vessels in the central tumor area compared to other subtypes.[4] A recent study that investigated correlation of dermoscopic findings with different histopathologic variants of basal cell carcinoma showed that dermoscopy had a low sensitivity to detect risk of recurrence.[5] Arborizing vessels was found to be the main dermoscopic finding in infiltrative basal cell carcinoma and truncated vessels and globules in micronodular basal cell carcinoma.[5]

This article confirms that dermoscopy is useful in the detection of basal cell carcinoma with limited impact in discriminating aggressive basal cell carcinomas from the non-aggressive ones. Detailed dermoscopic analysis did not reveal any distinct feature that would point to the aggressive nature of tumors. In the infiltrative basal cell carcinomas that were evaluated, the presence of dermoscopic features correlated with tumor thickness. In the clinically thicker parts of infiltrative basal cell carcinomas, multiple erosions and pigmented features were identified, whereas in the thin parts of tumors white areas were frequently found.

Similar dermoscopic features were also seen in morpheaform basal cell carcinomas with one important difference, the flat parts of tumors had well developed, branched arborizing vessels, in contrast to the domination of short fine telangiectasias in flat, superficial basal cell carcinoma. This could be explained by deeper infiltration of tumor cells and consequently increasing vascular needs of the tumor tissue. Furthermore, white areas/lines were a striking feature, also localized to the flat parts of lesions. This probably correlates with prominent collagen in the tumor stroma of morpheaform basal cell carcinoma.

In conclusion, dermoscopy appears to be of limited diagnostic value to determine the aggressive histological nature of basal cell carcinoma, though larger comparative studies are required to ascertain its value.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Wade TR, Ackerman AB. The many faces of basal-cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1978;4:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Crowson AN. Basal cell carcinoma: Biology, morphology and clinical implications. Mod Pathol 2006;19 Suppl 2:S127-47.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Popadic M. Dermoscopic features in different morphologic types of basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2014;40:725-32.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pyne J, Sapkota D, Wong JC. Aggressive basal cell carcinoma: dermatoscopy vascular features as clues to the diagnosis. Dermatol Pract Concept 2012;2:203a02.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Verduzco-Martínez AP, Quiñones-Venegas R, Guevara-Gutiérrez E, Tlacuilo-Parra A. Correlation of dermoscopic findings with histopathologic variants of basal cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol 2013;52:718-21.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow