Brand-Ad-30-6
 IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 3882 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (873 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2500    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded107    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
IMAGES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 81  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 542

Constricting band following incomplete condom removal


Department of Dermatology and STD, VM Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Joginder Kumar
Department of Dermatology and STD, VM Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.157452

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Kumar J, Ramesh V. Constricting band following incomplete condom removal. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:542

How to cite this URL:
Kumar J, Ramesh V. Constricting band following incomplete condom removal. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Sep 19];81:542. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2015/81/5/542/157452


A 28-year-old male had progressive penile ulceration for 50 days. After protected intercourse with his wife, he noted pain followed by ulceration with difficulty during urination. On examination, a deep cleft separated the glans from the shaft of penis. A constricting band was found embedded at the most distal part of the cleavage [Figure. 1]. On attempting to remove the band, it was revealed to be the proximal rolled part of a condom which had burrowed into the coronal sulcus.
Figure 1: Cleavage at coronal sulcus


Click here to view



    Figures

  [Figure. 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow