IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 719 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Article in PDF (598 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Reports
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4007    
    Printed96    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded267    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 81  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 380-384

Cutaneous tuberculosis due to multidrug-resistant tubercle bacilli and difficulties in clinical diagnosis


1 Department of Dermatology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
4 ESIPGIMER Medical College, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication3-Jul-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. V Ramesh
Department of Dermatology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and SJH, Ring Road, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.157447

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 

This report describes 6 HIV-negative patients including 5 children with scrofuloderma and an adult with lupus vulgaris, out of a total of 303 cases of cutaneous tuberculosis seen during a 4½-year period, who showed a positive tuberculin test and granulomatous histopathology, but failed to respond to first-line antitubercular therapy. They were suspected to have multidrug-resistant infection as no other cause could be ascertained. Tissue aspirate or biopsy was sent for histopathology and culture. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was isolated from the aspirate in three patients and sputum in one with associated pulmonary tuberculosis. Drug susceptibility tests showed that all isolates were resistant to rifampicin and isoniazid, and one each additionally to streptomycin and ethambutol, respectively. In two, culture was unsuccessful. All were administered second-line antitubercular drugs. Clinical improvement was appreciable within 2 months as weight gain, and regression of ulcers, swellings and plaques. Two completed the recommended 24 months of therapy. Multidrug-resistant cutaneous tuberculosis should be suspected in patients with no response to first-line drugs, with clinical deterioration, and where other causes of treatment failure are not forthcoming. Owing to poor isolation rates on culture and low sensitivity of molecular tests, in such cases, a trial of second-line anti-tubercular drugs may be justified for a reasonable period of 2 months. Where facilities permit, culture and drug sensitivity tests should be done before starting treatment. Culture positivity is better from aspirated material.


Keywords: Cutaneous tuberculosis, multidrug resistance, Mycobacterium tuberculosis


How to cite this article:
Ramesh V, Sen MK, Sethuraman G, D'Souza P. Cutaneous tuberculosis due to multidrug-resistant tubercle bacilli and difficulties in clinical diagnosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2015;81:380-4

How to cite this URL:
Ramesh V, Sen MK, Sethuraman G, D'Souza P. Cutaneous tuberculosis due to multidrug-resistant tubercle bacilli and difficulties in clinical diagnosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jun 26];81:380-4. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2015/81/4/380/157447



  Introduction Top


There is considerable awareness among the medical fraternity regarding the diagnosis and management of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Research in this area has been aided by the higher bacillary load in these patients, and the resultant high rates of culture positivity and ease of susceptibility testing. Higher bacillary load is believed to contribute to the development of drug-resistant TB due to the greater likelihood of spontaneous mutations conferring resistance to one or more drugs. However, in extrapulmonary forms like cutaneous tuberculosis, which are essentially paucibacillary, isolation of organisms in culture is difficult and hence demonstration of drug resistance becomes difficult, too. Often, even when the patient shows poor response and clinical deterioration while on anti-tubercular therapy, failure to suspect drug resistance frequently leads to overtreatment with first-line antitubercular drugs, or treatment for other presumed disorders, or misdiagnosis. This report describes the problems in arriving at the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant cutaneous tuberculosis in six patients and their good response to second-line drugs.


  Case Reports Top


Six out of 303 (187 adults and 116 children) patients of cutaneous tuberculosis seen during the 4΍-year period from 2010 to mid-2014 were provisionally diagnosed to have multidrug-resistant cutaneous tuberculosis as they had no relief with standard first-line antitubercular therapy given elsewhere with three or four drugs (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) for 6-12 months. The main findings in these patients are depicted in [Table 1]. They had been diagnosed to have cutaneous tuberculosis based on clinical features, significant Mantoux test reaction, and histopathological demonstration of granulomatous dermatitis. All were HIV-negative. However, while on first-line anti-tubercular drugs, new lesions gradually kept appearing and with the exception of an adult with lupus vulgaris, the others who were children and adolescents, were also losing weight, and had constitutional symptoms like fever and poor appetite.
Table 1: Pertinent clinical and laboratory details of patients with multidrug-resistant cutaneous tuberculosis


Click here to view


[Table 1] shows that five children had scrofuloderma and one woman had lupus vulgaris. A 14-year-old girl (case no. 1) had swelling of the right axillary lymph nodes with ulceration and sinuses; a 15-year-old girl (case no. 2) showed swelling of lymph nodes in cervical, submanadibular, and left axillary regions, with shallow erosions and depressed scars at places; a 12-year-old girl (case no. 3) had lower right axillary lymph node ulceration and an eroded subcutaneous gumma in the sternal area; a 12-year old boy (case no. 4) had cervical node swellings showing sinuses and multiple ulcerated subcutaneous gummas over the entire back and upper arms; and an 18-year old girl (case 6) had left axillary and epitrochlear lymph node swellings with sinuses, and a cold abscess on the left calf. History revealed that case no. 3 had developed fits during the 4 th month while on first-line drug therapy; admission followed by further investigations had revealed lymph node tuberculosis of the abdomen on computed tomography (CT) scan and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the brain had shown lesions in the posterior fossa, and right and left frontal lobes with perilesional edema. Oral phenytoin sodium had then been added to the anti-tubercular regimen to control fits. Case no. 5 was an adult woman with a large erythematous plaque over the left cheek and a few nodular lesions; one on the scalp and two on the right thigh, and enlarged submandibular and right axillary lymph-nodes. In addition to first-line anti-tubercular therapy, she had earlier also taken oral corticosteroids and itraconazole for the presumed diagnosis of sarcoidosis and deep mycosis; two abortive attempts had been made to culture both fungus and mycobacteria before she reported to us; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for leishmaniasis was also negative.

Routine hemogram, liver and renal function tests were within normal limits in all six patients. Chest X-ray revealed infiltration in case no. 2, left pleural thickening in case no. 4 and calcified hilar nodes in case no. 5. Since abscesses predominated in case nos. 1-3 and 6, the aspirate was sent for cytology and culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC MGIT 960 System (Becton Dickinson). Sputum from case no. 2 was also cultured. In case nos. 4 and 5, skin tissue was sent for histopathology and culture. As shown in [Table 1], three children (case nos. 1-3) showed granulomatous inflammation and acid-fast bacilli on fine needle aspiration cytology. The histopathological findings in the other three revealed epithelioid cell granulomas with Langhans' giant cells and necrosis in one, and no acid-fast bacilli. Culture was successful in four cases; in three from the aspirate and in one from the sputum alone. Drug sensitivity tests showed that all the four isolates were resistant to rifampicin and isoniazid. Additionally, the isolate from one child was also resistant to streptomycin and that from an adolescent girl, to ethambutol. In the other two where culture was negative; since no other diagnosis seemed forthcoming and the disease was worsening while on first-line drugs, it was decided to treat with second-line antitubercular drugs.

The four children were administered kanamycin injection i.m. 250 mg/day, and orally prothionamide 250 mg/day, cycloserine or terizidone 250 mg/day, and levofloxacin 500 mg/day. Adult doses were given in case nos. 5 and 6, with the addition of oral pyrazinamide 1500 mg/day. Kanamycin was stopped after the intensive phase of 6 months; the rest were maintained as before in the continuation phase. After 6 weeks, appetite improved and the ulcers showed signs of healing. The children gained 10 kg in weight within a year of therapy. Occasionally, new swellings appeared in two children but subsided quickly. The patient with lupus vulgaris and the adolescent girl noticed regression of lesions at the end of 2 months of treatment. Barring one child who improved but did not report later, the others continued treatment with good response in the form of closure of sinuses, scar formation at the sites of ulcers and non-appearance of new lesions. Considerable flattening of the plaques and reduction in size of the enlarged lymph nodes continued in the adult with lupus vulgaris. The lesions regressed well in those who completed a year of therapy [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]a and b. Monthly liver function tests and 3-monthly renal function tests remained normal. Two patients completed the stipulated 24 months of treatment with no signs of recurrence after 1 year and 2 months of follow-up, respectively.
Figure 1: Scrofuloderma of neck and submandibular area (a) before and (b) regression after a year of therapy


Click here to view
Figure 2: Erythematous plaque over right cheek (a) before and (b) subsidence following treatment for a year


Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis rests on the clinical presentation supported by a positive tuberculin test, granulomatous histopathology and regression following antitubercular therapy; barring few reports, culture has not been an important prerequisite because of poor isolation rates. [1] In a study of 112 isolates of M. tuberculosis from patients with skin tuberculosis it was observed that 96 were susceptible to all first-line drugs while 14 were resistant to one or more drugs tested; nevertheless resolution was noted with anti-tubercular therapy. [2] Cutaneous tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis has also responded favorably to the same regimen. [3] Hence, the lack of therapeutic response in a suspected case of cutaneous tuberculosis has traditionally been viewed as suggestive of an alternative diagnosis. However, such an approach requires modification with the rise in skin tuberculosis caused by multidrug-resistant organisms; i.e., strains resistant to rifampicin and INH. [4] The first report was in a boy with sporotrichoid skin infection followed by another in which two of three were children. [5],[6] In larger series, multidrug-resistant infection has been suspected and proven in the occasional patient with a typical clinical presentation accompanied by failure to respond to first-line drugs. [7]

The present report indicates that the possibility of multidrug-resistant cutaneous tuberculosis cannot be ignored when there is poor response to standard anti-tubercular drugs in patients where no other cause is forthcoming. One child had also developed fits while on treatment due to brain involvement. All these patients, diagnosed on the basis of histopathology, tuberculin test, and exclusion of other disorders, did well with second-line drugs recommended for multidrug-resistant infection. [8] Even the first child (whose aspirate revealed acid-fast bacilli but was culture negative) who could not be followed up beyond 4 months, showed an unequivocal response to second-line drugs. The increasing number of child cases, as seen in this report and documented earlier, [6],[7] indicates that drug-resistant infections are established in the community. Clinical improvement was evident around 6 weeks in the form of general well-being including gain of appetite and weight accompanied by signs of closure of sinuses and healing of ulcers. This is almost similar to that seen when the disease responds to first-line antitubercular drugs, [9] although the total duration of therapy is longer in multidrug-resistant cutaneous tuberculosis.

Children used to account for about a quarter of all patients of skin tuberculosis in India. A recent review [1] shows that the prevalence of cutaneous tuberculosis in children has doubled over time in the rapidly expanding conurbation of Delhi due to migration from different regions of India, a situation predicted in other countries too. [10] A similar trend in other forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis has emphasised the need for molecular-based rapid screening tests for multidrug-resistant infections. [11] The increasing incidence is also evidenced by the observation that the five "BRICS" countries, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, accounted for 60% of the new cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis seen in the world during the year 2011. [12] A recent article that summed up the status of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis disclosed that India had the second highest burden of multidrug-resistant patients, second only to China, with well established laboratories reporting multidrug resistance in 2.1% of new cases and as high as 15% in re-treatment cases. [13] A study from Delhi in both suspected pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis showed that the prevalence of multidrug resistance was around 3.7%. [14] Another alarming study revealed that out of 483 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis caused by multidrug-resistant strains, 18 (3.7%) showed extensive drug resistance. [15]

The problem of confirming the diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis caused by multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains unresolved. Owing to the low bacillary load, particularly in lupus vulgaris, isolation of organisms is difficult [16] and molecular tests for detection of resistance have low sensitivity. [17],[18] These tests need to be improved [15] and evaluated in skin tuberculosis. An observation of clinical relevance is that all the four positive isolates in this report were from liquefied material; abscess in three and sputum in one. We conclude that when there is a strong clinical suspicion of cutaneous tuberculosis in a patient, where after investigations other causes seem less likely, and the patient does not respond to first-line antitubercular drugs, a trial of second-line drugs may be justified. Though this line of approach is empirical and at times likely to be misused, it is nonetheless suggested by us due to the extremely poor availability of good laboratories, a serious challenge that pulmonologists also have to contend with. [13] Where facilities permit, culture followed by drug sensitivity tests should be done prior to starting second-line antitubercular therapy. However, despite a negative result on culture, the drugs should be continued in the patients' interest to prevent worsening of disease, but if there is no response, say within a reasonable period of 2 months, the diagnosis should be reviewed.

 
  References Top

1.
Sethuraman G, Ramesh V, Ramam M, Sharma VK. Skin tuberculosis in children: Learning from India. Dermatol Clin 2008;26:285-94.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Umapathy KC, Begum R, Ravichandran G, Rahman F, Paramasivan CN, Ramanathan VD. Comprehensive findings on clinical, bacteriological, histopathological and therapeutic aspects of cutaneous tuberculosis. Trop Med Int Hlth 2006;11:1521-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jaka-Moreno A, Lopez-Nunez M, Lopez-Pestana A, Tuneu-Valls A. Lupus vulgaris caused by Mycobacterium bovis. Acta Dermosifiliogr 2012;103:251-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Aggarwal P, Singal A, Bhattacharya SN, Mishra K. Comparison of the radiometric BACTEC 460 TB culture system and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for the isolation of mycobacteria in cutaneous tuberculosis and their drug susceptibility pattern. Int J Dermatol 2008;47:681-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ramesh V, Murlidhar S, Kumar J, Srivastava L. Isolation of drug-resistant tubercule bacilli in cutaneous tuberculosis. Pediatr Dermatol 2001;18:393-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ramesh V, Sen MK, Nair D, Singla R, Sengupta A. Cutaneous tuberculosis caused by multi-drug resistant tubercle bacilli. Int J Dermatol 2011;50:300-3.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Vashisht P, Sahoo B, Khurana N, Reddy BS. Cutaneous tuberculosis in children and adolescents: A clinicohistological study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21:40-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines. Geneva: World Heallth Organization; 2010. p. 83-93.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ramam M, Mittal R, Ramesh V. How soon does cutaneous tuberculosis respond to treatment? Implications for a therapeutic test of diagnosis. Int J Dermatol 2005;44:121-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Marcoval J, Alcaide E. Evolution of cutaneous tuberculosis over the past 30 years in a tertiary hospital on the European mediterranean coast. Clin Exp Dermatol 2013;38:131-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Maurya AK, Kant S, Nag VL, Kushwaha RA, Dhole TN. Trends of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance pattern in new cases and previously treated cases of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in referral hospitals in northern India. J Postgrad Med 2012;58:185-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
12.
WHO Fact Sheet, March 2013, Available from: http://www.who.int/td/[last accessed on 2014 Jan 14].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Behera D. Issues in the management of drug resistant tuberculosis in India. Lung India 2013;30:269-72.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
14.
Sagar T, Singh NP, Kashyap B, Kaur IR. Current status of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in a tertiary care hospital in East Delhi. J Postgrad Med 2013;59:173-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
15.
Porwal C, Kaushik A, Makkar N, Banvaliker NJ, Hanif M, Singla R, et al. Incidence and risk factors for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Delhi region. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e55299.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Noussair L, Bert F, Leflon-Guibout V, Gayet N, Nicolas-Chanoine M-H. Early diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by a new procedure combining broth culture and PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:1452-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zeka NA, Tasbakan S, Cavusoglu C. Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampicin resistance in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:4138-41.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hilleman D, Rusch-Gerdes S, Boehme C, Richter E. Rapid molecular detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by the automated GeneXpert MTB/RIF system. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:1202-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow