IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 2315 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (304 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2256    
    Printed45    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded165    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 78  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 192-193

Prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with pemphigus


1 Department of Clinical Immunology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunisia
2 Department of Dermatology, La Rabta, Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia

Date of Web Publication9-Mar-2012

Correspondence Address:
Ines Zaraa
Department of Dermatology, La Rabta, Hospital, Jabbari, Bab Saadoun, Tunis, 1007
Tunisia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.93642

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
El Beldi A, Zaraa I, Ahmed MB, Osman AB, Mokni M, Louzir H. Prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with pemphigus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2012;78:192-3

How to cite this URL:
El Beldi A, Zaraa I, Ahmed MB, Osman AB, Mokni M, Louzir H. Prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with pemphigus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Dec 8];78:192-3. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2012/78/2/192/93642


Sir,

Pemphigus is an autoimmune blistering skin disease mediated by pathogenic antibodies directed against desmoglein (Dsg). It includes two major forms: pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF). Several reports suggest an association between pemphigus and other autoimmune disorders. Such data are mainly based on isolated case reports or on serologic surveys using a limited number of autoantibodies. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5] Data related to the prevalence of nonorgan-specific autoantibodies in pemphigus are often lacking.

In order to determine the possible association between pemphigus and other autoimmune phenomena, we screened serum samples from 40 Tunisian patients with pemphigus (28 PV and 12 PF) and 40 healthy Tunisian volunteers (control group) for the presence of the following antibodies: anti-desmoglein antibodies (Anti-Dsg); antinuclear antibodies (ANA); anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL); anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA); gastric parietal cell antibodies (GPCA); anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA); liver kidney microsomal (LKM1); rheumatoid factor (RF).

Anti-Dsg (1 and 3) and aCL were detected using commercial ELISA (MBL, Nagoya, Japan and Binding site, respectively). ANA, ASMA, GPCA, AMA and anti-LKM1 antibodies were determined by indirect immunofluorescence on homemade liver, stomach and kidney cryostat sections from a Wistar rat. Cut-offs were 1:80 for ANA and 1:40 for ASMA, anti-LKM1 antibodies, GPCA and AMA. The RF was detected using human IgG-covered latex particle agglutination.

For statistical analysis, a P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

[Table 1] summarizes major results of this study. Within the pemphigus group, 35% (PV: 10/28, PF: 4/12) were positive for at least one of the following autoantibodies: ANA, ASMA, GPCA and AMA versus only 12.5% of healthy controls with a statistically significant difference (P=0.017). Two patients with PV exhibited antibodies against two different specificities (ASMA with aCL and ANA). In our cohort, ASMA and aCL were the most frequently detected autoantibodies.
Table 1: Autoantibody positivity in the pemphigus patients and the control group

Click here to view


Concerning aCL, they were found in sera of 15% (6/40) of pemphigus patients, whereas they were detected in only one healthy volunteer (2.5%), the difference was significant (P=0.052). Interestingly, the frequency of aCL was significantly higher in the PV subgroup compared with healthy controls (PV: 5/28, HC: 1/40; P=0.039). Besides, within the pemphigus group, three patients exhibited aCL at a high titer (>40 GPL/ml), whereas for the healthy controls the titer was low (16.67 GPL/ml). None of the patients or the healthy controls showed clinical symptoms of thromboembolism.

For all the others tested for autoantibodies, there was no significant difference between patients and healthy controls. Besides, no significant difference was noted between the untreated and the treated patients or between the PV and PF subgroups [Table 1].

The present study demonstrated that, globally, the occurrence of nonspecific autoantibodies in patients with pemphigus is higher than that observed in healthy controls. There was no clinical evidence of other concomitant autoimmune diseases. However, when we analyze the individual frequency of each tested antibody (except for anti-Dsg), there was no significant difference between the whole pemphigus group (without considering PV and PF subgroups) and healthy controls. Our results corroborate with findings obtained in other series, showing that ASMA, RF, AMA, GPCA and LKM1 positivity is not frequent in pemphigus. [5] Concerning ANA, their prevalence was low in our pemphigus cohort and, in the literature, there are conflicting results concerning its presence in pemphigus patients. [1],[2] This may be explained by a variation in the genetic background of the cohorts, differences in the techniques as well as differences in the number of enrolled patients.

It is worth noticing that corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive treatment in 57.5% of the patients of our study should be considered as important as it may have interfered with the positivity of circulating autoantibodies.

aCL autoantibodies were higher in the pemphigus group as compared with the healthy controls group, with a tendency to significance. The small number of patients investigated could explain the absence of a clear statistically significant difference in comparison with the control group. Interestingly, within the PV subgroup, aCL antibodies were significantly higher as compared with healthy controls, but without any relevant clinical symptoms. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of the presence of concomitant infections explaining the presence of aCL autoantibodies. Our findings also corroborate the results of a recent study showing an increased prevalence of IgG aCL in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases. [4] But, contrary to our findings, the authors reported thromboembolism in seven of 10 patients. Nevertheless, careful observation and follow-up may be required in this form of pemphigus to prevent symptomatic thrombotic events.

 
  References Top

1.Nisihara RM, de Bem RS, Hausberger R, Roxo VS, Pavoni DP, Petzl-Erler ML, et al. Prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem). Arch Dermatol Res 2003;295:133-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Mendes E, Martins de Castro R. Autoimmunity in patients with pemphigus foliaceus. Acta Allergol 1976;31:275-82.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Rizzeto M, Swana G, Doniach D. Microsomal antibodies in active chronic hepatitis and other disorders. Clin Exp Immunol 1973;15:331-44.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Echigo T, Hasegawa M, Inaoki M, Yamazaki M, Sato S, Takehara K. Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with autoimmune blistering disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;57:397-400.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Blondin DA, Zhang Z, Shideler KK, Hou H, Fritzler MJ, Mydlarski PR. Prevalence of non-organ-specific autoantibodies in patients with pemphigus vulgaris. J Cutan Med Surg 2009;13:82-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow