IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 724 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (361 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5626    
    Printed81    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded744    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ACNE IN INDIA: GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT - IAA CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 75  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 5-9

Pathogenesis of acne


members Indian Acne Alliance, India

Correspondence Address:
Raj Kubba
Consultant Dermatologist, Kubba Clinic,10, Aradhana Enclave, Ring Road, New Delhi - 110066
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Production and publication of this supplement is made possible by an educational grant from Galderma India Pvt. Ltd., Conflict of Interest: Indian Acne Alliance (IAA) meetings logistics to formulate IAA consensus document DQAcne in India: Guidelines for managementDQ were supported by Galderma India Pvt. Ltd.


PMID: 19282582

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Kubba R, Bajaj A K, Thappa D M, Sharma R, Vedamurthy M, Dhar S, Criton S, Fernandez R, Kanwar A J, Khopkar U, Kohli M, Kuriyipe V P, Lahiri K, Madnani N, Parikh D, Pujara S, Rajababu K K, Sacchidanand S, Sharma V K, Thomas J. Pathogenesis of acne. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75, Suppl S1:5-9

How to cite this URL:
Kubba R, Bajaj A K, Thappa D M, Sharma R, Vedamurthy M, Dhar S, Criton S, Fernandez R, Kanwar A J, Khopkar U, Kohli M, Kuriyipe V P, Lahiri K, Madnani N, Parikh D, Pujara S, Rajababu K K, Sacchidanand S, Sharma V K, Thomas J. Pathogenesis of acne. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2017 Oct 20];75, Suppl S1:5-9. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2009/75/7/5/45473


Acne represents obstruction and inflammation of the sebaceous follicles, a subtype of pilosebaceous units [Figure 1]. [1] Sebaceous follicles show dominant sebaceous gland and rudimentary hair. The primary and pathognomonic lesion of acne is microcomedo, a microscopic lesion invisible to the eye. Some microcomedones evolve into either a noninflammatory comedo (open or closed), or an inflammatory lesion such as papule, pustule, or nodule [Figure 2]. [2] The formation of a microcomedo requires a complex interplay of altered follicular keratinization, hyperplasia of sebaceous glands, and overcolonization of sebaceous follicles with Propionibacterium acnes [Figure 3]. Host immune response and inflammation also contribute to clinical picture and course. [2]

Altered follicular keratinization: The primary change in the sebaceous follicle is the alteration in the pattern of keratinization within the follicle. [3] Initial alteration is in the infrainfundibular portion where there is hyperproliferation. The excess keratin is also qualitatively altered as it tends to become densely packed along with monofilaments and lipid droplets. [2] Comedogenesis occurs when abnormally desquamated corneocytes accumulate in the sebaceous follicle and form a keratinous plug. [4] When the keratinous plug enlarges below a very small follicular pore at the skin surface, it becomes visible as a closed comedone (whitehead). An open comedone (blackhead) occurs if the follicular pore dilates. The small pore closed comedones are the precursors of inflammatory lesions. The closed comedones are the most frequent noninflamed clinical lesions and outnumber open comedones by a factor of four. [1] Subsequent proliferation of P. acnes generates inflammatory mediators and formation of inflammatory lesions. [5],[6] Immunohistochemical studies have shown an increase in the proliferation rate of the basal keratinocytes and abnormal differentiation of the follicular keratinocytes in the follicle wall of microcomedones and comedones.[4],[7],[8] These abnormalities may possibly be due to a relative decrease in sebaceous linoleic acid.[9] An androgen controlled defect may also contribute to abnormal proliferation through the 5-a reductase enzyme (type 1) in the infundibulum. [10] Follicular hyperproliferation is also associated with abnormal lipid inclusions (indicates abnormal differentiation).[6],[11],[12],[13] Cytokines are also involved in comedogenesis. High levels of biologically active interleukin-1α (IL-1α) have been detected in comedones, believed to be expressed by follicular keratinocytes and triggered by changes in sebum composition and secretion. [14],[15] IL-1α may compromise follicular barrier and thus induce inflammation. [15]

Seborrhea and sebaceous gland hyperplasia: The sebaceous glands start to enlarge with androgenic stimulus at 7-8 years of age (adrenarche), with a net increase in sebum excretion. [16],[17] The overall size of the sebaceous follicles increases along with number of lobules per gland. [18] Acne subjects, male and female, excrete more sebum than normal subjects, [19] and the sebum excretion rate correlates well with severity of acne. [20],[21] Sebocytes and follicular keratinocytes are capable of metabolizing androgens through enzymes 5-a reductase (type 1), and 3b and 17b hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. [10],[22],[23],[24],[25] These enzymes are present in undifferentiated basal sebocytes and with time the sebocytes differentiate and rupture releasing lipids into the sebaceous ducts. [26] The differentiation of the sebocyte is initiated by androgen uptake into the cell and its coupling with the cytoplasmic androgen receptor which, in turn, stimulates gene transcription and differentiation. [8],[22],[27] The increase in sebum production is mainly due to a difference in the response of the target organ (sebaceous follicle), to an increase in circulating androgens, or both. The target-organ responsiveness is variable and may be the explanation for the bilateral asymmetry of acne [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. [28] In vitro studies have shown that sebocytes from different areas of the body have different responses to dihydrotestosterone and testosterone. [29] Sebocytes from the leg have a lower response or do not respond, whereas those from the face show a dose-dependent proliferation. [29]

Bacterial colonization: P. acnes , an aerobic diphtheroid, is a normal skin resident and the principal component of the microbial flora of the pilosebaceous follicle. [30] In acne, the abnormal accumulation of corneocytes and the excess of sebum in the infrainfundibular portion of the duct is an ideal milieu for it to proliferate. [31] There is a correlation between colonization of the pilosebaceous duct and the onset of the microcomedo. There is no correlation between skin surface counts of P. acnes and the severity of acne [32] and yet it is also stated that P. acnes counts increase at each stage of acne as the follicle progresses from normal to comedone to an inflammatory lesion! [33] There is, however, correlation between the reduction of P. acnes and the clinical improvement in acne. [2] This reduction in P. acnes is associated with a reduction in proinflammatory mediators. [26],[34],[35] P. acnes is also being linked to toll-like receptors (TLR). TLR is a mammalian homologue of a drosophila protein known as toll that has emerged as a key regulator of host responses to infection. [36] Drosophila is a genus of small flies and includes many species of fruitflies. TLR is a transmembrane protein with a cytoplasmic portion homologous to IL-1 receptor. P. acnes bind to and activate TLR-2 which induces a cascade of signaling events involving monocytes and other inflammatory cells, and inflammatory cytokines. [37] The occurrence of such events has been confirmed in in vivo studies of inflammatory lesions in facial acne. [38] P. acnes also produce porphyrins which have become the target of novel light-based acne therapies. [39] The complete genome of P. acnes has been sequenced and has revealed a single circular chromosome of 2,560,265 base pairs, 2333 putative genes, and numerous gene products including sialidases, neuraminidases, endoglycoceramidases, lipases, and pore-forming factors. [40]

Inflammation and immunological factors: Inflammation is the key component of acne and the major reason for its morbidity and sequelae (pigmentary disturbances and scarring). Inflammation, for a long time was believed to be a secondary process in the pathogenesis of acne. New data indicate that immunological events led by perifollicular helper T-cells in genetically predisposed individuals may in fact be a primary process, initiating comedogenesis through elaboration of IL-1. [41] Further, inflammation may upregulate sebum production through production of inflammatory mediator leukotriene B4 that binds to receptors on the sebocytes. [41] Sebum production is also influenced by neuropeptides - substance P and its degrading enzyme neutral endopeptidase - that may explain stress-induced aggravation of acne. [42] P. acnes may directly contribute to inflammation through generation of proinflammatory lipases, proteases, hyaluronidases, and chemotactic factors. [30] Lipases hydrolyze triglycerides to form free fatty acids which are comedogenic and primary irritants. At the cellular level, inflammation begins with an influx of CD4+ T-lymphocytes. Later, macrophages, Langerhans cells, and cells expressing HLA-DR are present. [42] There is also angiogenesis and vascular adhesion molecule expression. [43] The propensity for acne scarring varies between individual acne patients and is independent of disease severity. [41] A histopathologic study [43] has shown differences in the character of the cellular infiltrate and in the speed of evolution and resolution of inflammation. In sequential biopsies, it was observed that in patients who tended to scar, the immune response was milder initially and evolved slowly (compared to nonscarring patients), but it was more specific in cellular detail, and the inflammation persisted for a longer duration. [43]

 
  References Top

1.Cunliffe WJ, Gollnick HPM. Acne: Diagnosis and management. London: Martin Dunitz; 2001. p. 1-46.   Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Gollnick H, Cunliffe W, Berson D, Dreno B, Finlay A, Leyden JJ, et al . Management of acne: A report from a global alliance to improve outcomes in acne. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:S1-38.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Knutson DD. Ultrastuctural observations in acne vulgaris: The normal sebaceous follicles and acne lesions. J Invest Dermatol 1974;62:288-307.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Cunliffe WJ, Holland DB, Clark SM, Stables GI. Comedogenesis: Some new aetiological, clinical and therapeutic strategies. Br J Dermatol 2000;142:1084-91.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Plewig G, Fulton JE, Kligman AM. Cellular dynamics of comedo formation in acne vulgaris. Arch Dermatol Forsch 1971;242:12-29.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Kurokawa I, Mayer-da-Silva A, Gollnick H, Orfanos CF. Occurrence and distribution of cytokeratins and filagrin in the human pilosebaceous unit: An immunocytochemical study. In: Marks R, Plewig G, editors. Acne and related disorders. London: Martin Dunitz; 1989. p. 19-22.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Knaggs HE, Holland DB, Morris C, Wood EJ, Cunliffe WJ. Quantification of cellular proliferation in acne using the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Invest Dermatol 1994;102:89-92.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Hughes BR, Morris C, Cunliffe WJ, Leigh IM. Keratin expression in pilosebaceous epithelia in truncal skin of acne patients. Br J Dermatol 1996;134:247-56.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Downing DT, Stewart ME, Wertz PW, Strauss JS. Essential fatty acids and acne. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986;14:221-5.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Thibutot DM, Knaggs H, Gilliand K, Hagari S. Activity of type 1 5-a reductase and 17-β -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the infrainfundibulum of subjects with and without acne vulgaris. Dermatology 1998;196:38-42.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Thielitz A, Helmdach M, Roepke EM, Gollnick H. Lipid analysis of follicular casts from cyanoacrylate strips as a new method for studying therapeutic effects of antiacne agents. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:19-27.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Lavker RM, Leyden JJ. Lamellar inclusions in follicular horny cells: A new aspect of abnormal keratinization. J Ultrastruct Res 1979;69:362-70.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Kluznik AR, Wood EJ, Cunliffe WJ. Keratin characterization in the pilosebaceous ducts of acne patients. In: Marks R, Plewig G, editors. Acne and related disorders. London: Martin Dunitz; 1989. p. 113-5.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Ingham E, Eady EA, Goodwin CE. Pro-inflammatory levels of interlukin 1-a like bioactivity are present in the majority of open comedones in acne vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol 1992;98:895-901.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Guy R, Kealey T. Modelling the infundibulum in acne. Dermatology 1998;196:32-7.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Pochi PE, Strauss JS, Downing DT. Age related changes in sebaceous gland activity. J Invest Dermatol 1979;73:108-11.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Pochi PE, Strauss JS. Endocrinologic control of the development and activity of the human sebaceous gland. J Invest Dermatol 1974;62:191-201.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Gollnick HPM, Zouboulis CC, Akamatsu H, Kurokawa I, Schulte A. Pathogenesis and pathogenesis-related treatment of acne. J Dermatol 1991;18:489-99.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Pochi PE, Strauss JS. Sebum production, casual sebum levels, titrable acidity of sebum and urinary fractional 17-ketosteroid excretion in males with acne. J Invest Dermatol 1964;43:383-8.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Burton JL, Shuster S. The relationship between seborrhea and acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1971;84:600-1.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Cunliffe WJ, Shuster S. Pathogenesis of acne. Lancet 1969;1:685-7.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Thibutot D, Harris G, Iles V, Cimis G, Gilliland K, Hagari S. Activity of the type 1 5-alpha-reductase exhibits regional differences in isolated sebaceous glands and whole skin. J Invest Dermatol 1995;105:209-14.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Thibutot D, Knaggs H, Gilliand H, Lin G. Activity of 5-a-reductase and 17-β -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the infrainfundibulum of subjects with and without acne vulgaris. Dermatology 1998;196:38-42.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Chen W, Zouboulis CC, Fritsch M, Kodelja V, Orfanos CE. Heterogeneity and quantitative differences of type 1 5-a-reductase expression in cultured skin epithelial cells. Dermatology 1998;196:51-2.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Fritsch M, Orfanos CE, Zouboulis CC. Sebocytes are the key regulators of androgen homeostasis in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 2001;116:793-800.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Leyden JJ. New understandings of the pathogenesis of acne. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:S15-25.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Schmidt JB, Spona J, Huber J. Androgen receptor in hirsutism and acne. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1986;22:206-11.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Deplewski D, Rosenfield RL. Role of hormones in pilosebaceous unit development. Endocrine Rev 2000;21:363-92.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Akamatsu H, Zouboulis CC, Orfanos CE. Control of human sebocyte poriliferation in vitro by testosterone and 5-a-dihydrotestosterone is dependent on the localization of the sebaceous gland. J Invest Dermatol 1992;99:509-11.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Habif TP. Acne, rosacea, and related disorders, In: Habif TP, editor, Clinical dermatology: A color guide to diagnosis and therapy. 4 th ed. Edinburgh: Mosby; 2004. p. 168-70.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Auffret N. What's new concerning the pathophysiology of acne? Ann Dermatol Venereol 2003;130:101-6.  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ, Mills OH, Kligman AM. Propionibacterium levels in patients with and without acne vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol 1975;65:382-4.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Simpson NB, Cunliffe WJ. Disorders of the sebaceous gland. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Textbook of dermatology. 7 th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2004. p. 43.22.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Webster GF, Tsai CC, Leyden JJ. Neutrophil lysosomal release in response to Propionibacterium acnes . J Invest Dermatol 1979;72:209.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Webster GF, Kligman AM. A method for the assay of inflammatory mediators in follicular casts. J Invest Deramtol 1979;73:266-8.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Kapetanovic R, Cavaillon JM. Early events in innate immunity in the recognition of microbial pathogens. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2007;7:907-18.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Kim J, Ochoa MT, Kruzik SR, Takeuchi O, Uematsu S, Legaspi AJ, et al . Activation of toll-like recptor 2 in acne triggers inflammatory cytokine responses. J Immunol 2002;169:1535-541.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Jugeau S, Tenaud I, Knol AC, Jarousse V, Quereux G, Khammari A, et al . Induction of toll-like receptors by Propionibacterium acnes . Br J Dermatol 2005;153:1105-13.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Boprelli C, Merk K, Jacob K, Schaller M, Vogeser M, Weindl G, et al . In vivo porphyrin production by P. acnes in untreated acne patients and its modulation by acne treatment. Acta Dermatol Venereol 2006;86:316-9.  Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Bruggemann H, Henne A, Hoster F, Liesegang H, Wiezer A, Strittmatter A, et al . The complete genome sequence of Propionibacterium acnes : A commensal of human skin. Science 2004;305:671-3.   Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Jeremy AH, Holland DB, Roberts SG, Thomson KF, Cunliffe WJ. Inflammatory events are involved in acne lesion initiation. J Invest Dermatol 2003;121:20-7.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Zouboulis CC, Bφhm M. Neuroendocrine regulation of sebocytes: A pathogenetic link between stress and acne. Exp Dermatol 2004;13:31-5.  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Holland DB, Jeremy AH, Roberts SG, Seukeran DC, Layton AM, Cunliffe WJ. Inflammation in acne scarring: A comparison of the responses in lesions from patients prone and not prone to scar. Br J Dermatol 2004;150:72-81.  Back to cited text no. 43    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow