Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
15th National Conference of the IAOMFP, Chennai, 2006
Abstract
Abstracts from current literature
Acne in India: Guidelines for management - IAA Consensus Document
Addendum
Announcement
Art & Psychiatry
Article
Articles
Association Activities
Association Notes
Award Article
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Analysis
Case Letter
Case Letters
Case Notes
Case Report
Case Reports
Clinical and Laboratory Investigations
Clinical Article
Clinical Studies
Clinical Study
Commentary
Conference Oration
Conference Summary
Continuing Medical Education
Correspondence
Corrigendum
Cosmetic Dermatology
Cosmetology
Current Best Evidence
Current Issue
Current View
Derma Quest
Dermato Surgery
Dermatopathology
Dermatosurgery Specials
Dispensing Pearl
Do you know?
Drug Dialogues
e-IJDVL
Editor Speaks
Editorial
Editorial Remarks
Editorial Report
Editorial Report - 2007
Editorial report for 2004-2005
Errata
Erratum
Focus
Fourth All India Conference Programme
From Our Book Shelf
From the Desk of Chief Editor
General
Get Set for Net
Get set for the net
Guest Article
Guest Editorial
History
How I Manage?
IADVL Announcement
IADVL Announcements
IJDVL Awards
IJDVL AWARDS 2015
IJDVL Awards 2018
IJDVL Awards 2019
IJDVL Awards 2020
IJDVL International Awards 2018
Images in Clinical Practice
In Memorium
Inaugural Address
Index
Knowledge From World Contemporaries
Leprosy Section
Letter in Response to Previous Publication
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor - Case Letter
Letter to the Editor - Letter in Response to Published Article
LETTER TO THE EDITOR - LETTERS IN RESPONSE TO PUBLISHED ARTICLES
Letter to the Editor - Observation Letter
Letter to the Editor - Study Letter
Letter to the Editor - Therapy Letter
Letter to the Editor: Articles in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters in Response to Previous Publication
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - Letter in Response to Previously Published Articles
Letters to the Editor: Case Letters
Letters to the Editor: Letters in Response to Previously Published Articles
Medicolegal Window
Messages
Miscellaneous Letter
Musings
Net Case
Net case report
Net Image
Net Images
Net Letter
Net Quiz
Net Study
New Preparations
News
News & Views
Obituary
Observation Letter
Observation Letters
Oration
Original Article
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Original Contributions
Pattern of Skin Diseases
Pearls
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Rounds
Perspective
Presedential Address
Presidential Address
Presidents Remarks
Quiz
Recommendations
Regret
Report
Report of chief editor
Report of Hon : Treasurer IADVL
Report of Hon. General Secretary IADVL
Research Methdology
Research Methodology
Resident page
Resident's Page
Resident’s Page
Residents' Corner
Residents' Corner
Residents' Page
Retraction
Review
Review Article
Review Articles
Reviewers 2022
Revision Corner
Self Assessment Programme
SEMINAR
Seminar: Chronic Arsenicosis in India
Seminar: HIV Infection
Short Communication
Short Communications
Short Report
Snippets
Special Article
Specialty Interface
Studies
Study Letter
Study Letters
Supplement-Photoprotection
Supplement-Psoriasis
Symposium - Contact Dermatitis
Symposium - Lasers
Symposium - Pediatric Dermatoses
Symposium - Psoriasis
Symposium - Vesicobullous Disorders
SYMPOSIUM - VITILIGO
Symposium Aesthetic Surgery
Symposium Dermatopathology
Symposium-Hair Disorders
Symposium-Nails Part I
Symposium-Nails-Part II
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Tables
Technology
Therapeutic Guideline-IADVL
Therapeutic Guidelines
Therapeutic Guidelines - IADVL
Therapeutics
Therapy
Therapy Letter
Therapy Letters
View Point
Viewpoint
What’s new in Dermatology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2009:75:3;272-278
doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.51244
PMID: 19439880

Profile of acne vulgaris-A hospital-based study from South India

Balaji Adityan, Devinder Mohan Thappa
 Department of Dermatology and STD, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India

Correspondence Address:
Devinder Mohan Thappa
Department of Dermatology and STD, JIPMER, Pondicherry - 605 006
India
How to cite this article:
Adityan B, Thappa DM. Profile of acne vulgaris-A hospital-based study from South India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:272-278
Copyright: (C)2009 Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is believed to be the most common disease of the skin. There is no Indian study on the profile of acne vulgaris, markers of severe forms of acne vulgaris and a possible correlation between acne vulgaris and markers of androgenicity in females. Aim: To study the profile of acne vulgaris, its seasonal variation, relationship with smoking and possible correlation between acne vulgaris and markers of androgenicity in females. Methods: The study was conducted between August 2006 and June 2008. All patients with acne vulgaris who consented to participate in the study were included. The parameters evaluated included age, gender, age of onset, duration of lesions, site of lesions, grade, relation with menstrual cycle, markers of androgenicity, number of acne lesions such as comedones, papules pustules and nodules, number and site of post-acne scarring, post-acne hyperpigmentation, seasonal variation and history of smoking. Results: A total of 309 patients with acne vulgaris were included in the study. The frequency of acne vulgaris in our study was 1.068%. Mean age of the study group was 19.78 years. Male to female ratio was 1.25:1. The most common age group involved was 16 to 20 years (59.8%). Mean age of onset was 15.97 years. Face was involved in all the patients, followed by back (28.2%), chest (20.1%), neck (9.4%) and arms (10%). In the older age groups, women were more likely to report having acne vulgaris than men ( P = 0.01). The closed comedones outnumbered open comedones by a factor of 4.9:1. A total of 186 patients (60.2%) had grade 1 acne vulgaris, 85 (27.5%) had grade 2 acne, 8 (2.6%) had grade 3 acne and 30 (9.7%) had grade 4 acne vulgaris. There was a higher incidence of scarring (39.5%) and post-acne hyperpigmentation (24.6%) in our study. In female patients, 57.7% had premenstrual flare and 12.4% had cutaneous markers of androgenicity. There was no association between severity of acne vulgaris and other markers of androgenicity ( P = 0.108). Seborrheic dermatitis (21.35%) was the most common disease associated. Seasonal variation was observed only in 80 patients (25.9%); 71 patients (23%) exacerbated in summer and 9 patients (2.9%) in winter. Smokers had more severe grade of acne vulgaris compared to nonsmokers ( P = 0.001). Conclusion: This study brings out the clinical profile of acne vulgaris in a tertiary care hospital in South India.
Keywords: Acne vulgaris, Comedones, Post-acne scarring, Post-acne pigmentation, Androgenicity

Introduction

Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous units. [1] It is believed to be the most common disease of the skin. [2],[3] The condition usually starts in adolescence, peaks at the ages of 14 to 19 years and frequently resolves by mid-twenties. Acne vulgaris develops earlier in females than in males, which may reflect the earlier onset of puberty in females. The most severe forms of acne vulgaris occur more frequently in males, but the disease tends to be more persistent in females. [1] Severity of the disease varies markedly from one individual to the other depending upon the interplay of various factors involved in the development of acne vulgaris. Grading systems based on the clinical appearance of lesions as well as "lesion counting" are useful in assessing the severity of acne vulgaris.

Although very common, the disease can cause significant emotional distress and physical scarring if left untreated. To the best of our knowledge, there is no Indian study on the profile of acne vulgaris, its seasonal variation, relationship with smoking and possible correlation between it and markers of androgenicity in females. Our study was undertaken to address these issues.

Methods

This study was conducted between August 2006 and June 2008. All patients with acne vulgaris attending our outpatient department (OPD) who consented to participate in the study were included. Patients with acne vulgaris not willing to participate in the study and patients with drug-induced and other acneiform eruptions were excluded. The parameters evaluated include age, gender, age of onset, duration of lesions, site of lesions, grade, relation to menstrual cycle, markers of androgenicity, number of acne lesions such as comedones, papules pustules and nodules, number and site of post-acne scarring, post-acne hyperpigmentation, seasonal variation and history of smoking. Acne vulgaris was graded using a simple grading system taking into account the predominant lesion to grade acne, which classifies acne vulgaris into four grades. [4]

  • Grade 1: Comedones, occasional papules
  • Grade 2: Papules, comedones, few pustules
  • Grade 3: Predominant pustules, nodules, abscesses
  • Grade 4: Mainly cysts, abscesses, widespread scarring

Institute ethical committee clearance was obtained. Data collected from the patients were tabulated in a Microsoft Excel worksheet and a computer-based analysis of the data was performed using SPSS 15 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Of the 28,917 new patients who attended the dermatology OPD during the study period, 309 patients had acne vulgaris and the frequency was 1.068%. Of the 309 patients, 137 (44.3%) were females and 172 (55.7%) were males. Male to female ratio was 1.25:1. The age of the patients varied from 13 to 45 years with the mean of 19.78 years (SD ± 4.94). The most common age groups to be involved in acne vulgaris were 16-20 years (185 cases, 59.8%) and 21-25 years (60 cases, 19.4 %). [Table - 1] shows age and gender characteristics of the patients with acne vulgaris.

It was found that patients aged 20 years or older (89 vs. 220) are more likely to have severe grade of acne vulgaris ( P = 0.011). It was also found that male patients had more severe acne vulgaris ( P < 0.0001) (30 males vs. 6 females had grade 4 acne vulgaris). Mean duration of acne vulgaris was 45.55 months and the range was 1 month to 25 years. Patients with longer duration of the disease had more severe acne vulgaris ( P = 0.022) [Table - 2].

Mean age of onset of patients in this study was 15.9 years (SD ± 3.004) (range, 10-33 years). The mean age of onset in male patients (15.9 ± 2.33 years) was earlier compared to female patients (16.05 ± 3.68 years). However, this was not statistically significant ( P = 0.112). A majority of the patients were college students (33.3%) or school students (33%).

Face was involved in all the patients with acne vulgaris. However, face alone was involved in 202 (65.4%). This was followed by the involvement of the back (28.2%), chest (20.1%), neck (9.4%) and arms (10%).

The most common type of lesion in this study was closed comedones, present in all patients [Figure - 1] (mean count = 6.67; range = 0-118 at various sites). Open comedones [Figure - 2] were the second most common type of lesion of acne vulgaris (mean count = 1.36; range = 0-85 at various sites) followed by papules (mean count = 1.13;range = 0-30 at various sites), pustules (mean count = 0.17; range = 0-30 at various sites) and nodulocysts (mean count = 0.11; range = 0-18 at various sites). The mean number of noninflammatory lesions was 4.02 and that of inflammatory lesions was 0.47. The ratio of noninflammatory to inflammatory lesions was 8.55:1. The closed comedones outnumbered open comedones by a factor of 4.9:1.

A total of 186 patients (60.2%) had grade 1 acne vulgaris, and 85 (27.5%) had grade 2 acne. Grade 3 acne vulgaris was diagnosed in 8 patients (2.6%) [Figure - 3] and grade 4 acne vulgaris in 30 patients (9.7%) [Figure - 4].

Post-acne scarring was seen in 122 patients (39.5%). Cheeks were the most common site of post-acne scarring, being involved in all the 122 patients. Nondistensible deep scars (ice-pick scars) were the most common type of scars (65.57%) [Table - 3],[Figure - 5].

Patients with longer duration of the disease are more likely to have post-acne scarring (56.03% in duration> 3 years vs. 29.5% in duration < 3 years; P < 0.001). Post-acne hyperpigmentation was observed in 76 patients (24.6%). Fourteen female patients (10.2%) gave a history of irregular menstrual periods. Seventy-nine female patients (57.7%) gave a history of premenstrual flare. Seventeen patients (12.4%) had some marker of androgenicity. The most common marker of androgenicity observed was hirsutism (76.4%) [Table - 4]. There was no association between severity of acne vulgaris and other markers of androgenicity ( P = 0.108).

Seborrheic dermatitis was the most common disease associated with acne vulgaris (21.35%). Seasonal variation was observed only in 80 patients (25.9%); 71 patients (23%) exacerbated in summer and 9 patients (2.9%) in winter. In 39 patients (12.6%), duration of disease was less than 12 months; hence, seasonal variation could not be determined. Only 10 patients (3.2%) were smokers. Men who were smokers had more severe grade of acne vulgaris compared to nonsmokers (50% smokers vs. 8.36% nonsmokers had grade 4 acne vulgaris; P = 0.001).

Discussion

Acne vulgaris is a chronic condition that is virtually universal in adolescence. An individual is more likely to develop acne than any other disease. [1] Hospital-based studies done on acne vulgaris in Asian population have shown that acne vulgaris constitutes 11.2% and 19.6% of the total new patients attending their hospitals. [5],[6] A survey of Australian private dermatology practices reported that of 3197 new diagnoses, 320 (10%) patients were for acne. [7] In our study, acne vulgaris accounted for 1.06% of the total number of new patients examined in our center. Frequency of acne vulgaris in our study was low probably due to a low prevalence of acne vulgaris among South Indian population.

Al-Ameer and Al-Akloby, [5] in their study of 225 patients with acne vulgaris observed that the age at presentation was 19.2 ± 3.0 years for males and 18.4 ± 4.2 years for females. Kane et al . [8] noted that the mean age of presentation of their patients was 25.58 years. The mean age of patients in our study population was 19.78 years (SD ± 4.94). Unlike teenage acne, where males tend to show the most severe forms of the disease, adult acne mainly affects females. [1],[9],[10] In our study also, in the older age group, women were more affected by acne vulgaris than men ( P = 0.01). In accordance with earlier studies, [11],[12] it was found in our study also that severe acne occurred commonly in patients of older age group.

Another interesting observation made in our study was that male patients had more severe acne vulgaris as recorded in other studies. [11],[13] Acne vulgaris develops earlier in females than in males. [1],[2],[5],[11],[13],[14] The earlier onset of clinical acne in girls than boys is presumably related to their earlier puberty. However, in our study, there was no significant difference regarding the age of onset of acne vulgaris among both sexes.

Acne vulgaris occurs in sites, which are rich in pilosebaceous units. It was noticed in our study that face was the theater of action in all the patients with acne vulgaris (100%), back was involved in 28.2%, chest was involved in 20.1%, neck was involved in 9.4% and arms were involved in 10%. These observations are in accordance with data from earlier literature. [1],[15],[16] Acne vulgaris is a polymorphic disease. [1] The primary and the pathognomonic lesion of acne vulgaris is a comedone, which may be open or closed. [15] Kilkenny et al . [11] and Cunliffe et al . [17] reported that comedones were the most common type of lesion. It is known that the closed comedones are usually present in much greater numbers than open comedones. [18] The most common type of lesion in our group of acne patients was closed comedones.

In our study, we graded the severity of acne vulgaris, using a simple and quick system of classification using a four-grade system. [4] Although our study is a hospital-based study, patients with grade 1 (predominantly comedonal) acne vulgaris outnumbered patients with more severe inflammatory forms of the disease. Similar finding was noticed by Kane et al. [8] in their study.

Kane et al. [8] noticed that 40.2% of their 93 patients with acne vulgaris had post-acne scarring. Lower incidence of post-acne scarring in acne vulgaris patients has been recorded in other studies. Kilkenny et al. [11] reported 25% of the 615 patients with post-acne scarring. Taylor et al. [19] also noted 5.9% of their patients with post-acne scarring. Post-acne scarring was noticed in 39.5% of our acne patients. The relatively high incidence of post-acne scarring may be a phenomenon in the South Indian race. We also observed that patients with longer duration of the disease were more likely to have post-acne scarring. This is an expected finding, which is also reported in earlier studies. [10],[20] The ice-pick scars were the most common type of post-acne scars, noticed in 65.57% of the patients with post-acne scarring. The findings in our study were in accordance with those of Layton et al . [20]

Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation is a common complication of acne vulgaris, particularly in pigmented skin. [1] Kane et al. , [8] noted that 67.7% of their patients had post-acne pigmentation. Similarly, Yeung et al. , [21] observed 552 adolescent patients with acne vulgaris, of which 52.6% had hyperpigmentation. Taylor et al. [19] noticed 52.6% of their patients with postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Post-acne hyperpigmentation was observed in 76 patients (24.6%) in our study. The incidence of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in our study was lower compared to that in earlier studies.

The premenstrual acne flares is well recognized. The pilosebaceous duct becomes smaller between days 15 and 20 of the menstrual cycle and the blockage leads to premenstrual acne. However, the mechanism for this blockage is not known. [22] Stoll et al. [23] found an overall 44% prevalence of premenstrual flare. Khanna and Pandhi . [24] noticed a mean reduction in the noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions count during the postmenstrual period. Premenstrual flare was noticed in 57.7% of the 137 female patients in our study.

The incidence of hirsutism and irregular menses observed in earlier studies [25],[26],[27] varied between 0% to 21% and 15.5% to 48%, respectively. The corresponding figures in our study were 9.48% and 10.2%, respectively. Sheehan-Dare et al. [28] and Cibula et al. [26] concluded that there is no correlation between acne severity and clinical markers of androgenicity in women. Although these studies have shown no correlation between acne severity and markers of androgenicity, previous studies including one done by Reingold and Rosenfield . [29] have found an association between acne, hirsutes and menstrual disturbance. In our study, we observed no association between severity of acne vulgaris and clinical markers of androgenicity.

Both acne vulgaris and seborrheic dermatitis have predilection for the seborrheic areas of the body such as face, ears, scalp and upper part of the trunk. Moreover, it is well known that seborrhea plays a central role in the pathogenesis of both the diseases. In seborrheic dermatitis as well as in acne vulgaris, the lipid composition of sebum is characterized by a high triglyceride level. [30] In a Spanish study involving 2159 patients with seborrheic dermatitis, it was found that acne vulgaris was the most common concomitant disease seen in 35% of the subjects. [31] Seborrheic dermatitis was the most common disease associated with acne vulgaris in our study.

The relationship between smoking and acne vulgaris is controversial. Mills et al. [32] and Rombouts et al. [33] showed that incidence of acne vulgaris in smokers was significantly lower than nonsmokers. Schafer et al. [34] and Chuh et al. [35] in their studies noted that smoking is likely to bear a positive correlation with acne. In our study, men who were smokers had more severe grade of acne vulgaris compared to nonsmokers. Since the number of smokers is small, no valid conclusion can be derived from this. Impaired vasoreactivity, relative ascorbic acid deficiency, impaired collagen synthesis and wound healing in smokers may play some part in the underlying pathogenesis for the association between smoking and acne.

The improvement of acne in summer and exacerbation in winter is a conventional dermatological opinion. Studies done in the past have shown varied results regarding seasonal variation in acne vulgaris. A Saudi Arabian study has shown that acne exacerbates in winter, and often improves during the summer months. [5] An Indian study showed that majority of patients with acne vulgaris worsened during summer. [36] In our study, seasonal variation was observed only in 80 patients (25.9%); 71 patients (23%) exacerbated in summer and 9 (2.9%) in winter. This observation was against the conventional view that acne vulgaris exacerbates in winter and improves in summer.

To conclude, our study included 309 patients with acne vulgaris, with the frequency of the disease being 1.068% of patients attending dermatology OPD. The mean age of the patients was 19.78 years and the male to female ratio was 1.25:1. In the older age group, women were more affected than men ( P = 0.001). Most patients were in the age group of 16-20 years (59.8%) and the majority being either college (33.3%) or school (33%) students. Face was involved in all cases and face involvement alone was observed in 202 (65.4%) cases. There were 186 patients (60.2%) with grade 1 acne vulgaris, 85 (27.5%) with grade 2 acne, 8 (2.6%) with grade 3 acne and 30 (9.7%) with grade 4 acne. Closed comedones were the predominant lesions, with the ratio of closed comedones to open comedones being 4.9:1 and the ratio of noninflammatory to inflammatory lesions as 8.55:1. Scarring and hyperpigmentation, the sequelae of acne, were observed in 39.5% and 24.6% of patients, respectively. Seventeen of our female patients (12.4%) had cutaneous markers of androgenicity and the most common marker was hirsutism (76.4%). The most common disease associated was seborrheic dermatitis (21.35%). Seasonal variation was observed only in 80 patients (25.9%); 71 patients (23%) exacerbated in summer and 9 patients (2.9%) in winter. Men who were smokers had a more severe grade of acne vulgaris compared to nonsmokers ( P = 0.001). This study brings out the clinical profile of acne vulgaris in a tertiary care hospital in South India. As this study is hospital based and carried out at a tertiary care center, future studies with more number of patients and even population-based studies can truly find the prevalence of acne vulgaris in our community. The drawback of this study was that female patients who had clinical markers of androgenicity were not explored for hormonal abnormality, if any.

References
1.
Simpson NB, Cunliffe WJ. Disorders of sebaceous glands. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology, 7 th ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 43.1-43.75.
th ed., Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p. 43.1-43.75.'>[Google Scholar]
2.
Gelmetti CC, Krowchuk DP, Lucky AW. Acne. In: Schachner LA, Katz SI, editors. Pediatric Dermatology, 3 rd ed., Philadelphia: Mosby; 2003. p. 589-609.
[Google Scholar]
3.
Kerkemeyer K. Acne Vulgaris. Plast Surg Nursing 2005;25:31-5.
[Google Scholar]
4.
Tutakne MA, Chari KV. Acne, rosacea and perioral dermatitis. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, editors. IADVL Textbook and atlas of dermatology, 2 nd ed., Mumbai: Bhalani Publishing House; 2003. p. 689-710.
[Google Scholar]
5.
Al-Ameer AM, Al-Akloby OM. Demographic features and seasonal variations in patients with acne vulgaris in Saudi Arabia: A hospital-based study. Int J Dermatol 2002;41:870-1.
[Google Scholar]
6.
Tan HH, Tan AW, Barkham T, Yan XY, Zhu M. Community-based study of acne vulgaris in adolescents in Singapore. Br J Dermatol 2007;157:547-51.
[Google Scholar]
7.
Stathakis V, Kilkenny M, Marks R. Descriptive epidemiology of acne vulgaris in the community. Australas J Dermatol 1997;38:115-23.
[Google Scholar]
8.
Kane A, Niang SO, Diagne AC, Ly F, Ndiaye B. Epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic features of acne in Dakar, Senegal. Int J Dermatol 2007;46:36-8.
[Google Scholar]
9.
Knaggs HE, Wood EJ, Rizer RL, Mills OH. Post-adolescent acne. Int J Cosmet Sci 2004;26:129-38.
[Google Scholar]
10.
Goulden V, Stables GI, Cunliffe WJ. Prevalence of facial acne in adults. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:577-80.
[Google Scholar]
11.
Kilkenny M, Merlin K, Plunkett A, Marks R. The prevalence of common skin conditions in Australian school students: 3, Acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1998;139:840-5.
[Google Scholar]
12.
Collier CN, Harper JC, Cantrell WC, Wang W, Foster KW, Elewski BE. The prevalence of acne in adults 20 years and older. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58:56-9.
[Google Scholar]
13.
Burton JL, Cunliffe WJ, Stafford I, Shuster S. The prevalence of acne vulgaris in adolescence. Br J Dermatol 1971;85:119-26.
[Google Scholar]
14.
Lucky AW, Biro FM, Huster GA, Leach AD, Morrison JA, Ratterman J. Acne vulgaris in premenarchal girls. An early sign of puberty associated with rising levels of dehydroepiandrosterone. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:308-14.
[Google Scholar]
15.
Zaenglein AL, Graber EM, Thiboutot DM, Strauss JS. Acne vulgaris and acneiform eruptions. In: Wolff K, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, editors. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General medicine, 7 th ed., New York: McGraw Hill publishing; 2008. p. 690-703.
th ed., New York: McGraw Hill publishing; 2008. p. 690-703.'>[Google Scholar]
16.
Amado JM, Matos ME, Abreu AM, Loureiro L, Oliveira J, Verde A, et al . The prevalence of acne in the north of Portugal. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:1287-95.
[Google Scholar]
17.
Cunliffe WJ, Holland DB, Clark SM, Stables GI. Comedogenesis: some new aetiological, clinical and therapeutic strategies. Br J Dermatol 2000;142:1084-91.
[Google Scholar]
18.
Cunliffe WJ, Holland DB, Jeremy A. Comedone formation: etiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. Clin Dermatol 2004;22:367-74.
[Google Scholar]
19.
Taylor SC, Cook-Bolden F, Rahman Z, Strachan D. Acne vulgaris in skin of color. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:S98-106.
[Google Scholar]
20.
Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994;19:303-8.
[Google Scholar]
21.
Yeung CK, Teo LH, Xiang LH, Chan HH. A community-based epidemiological study of acne vulgaris in Hong Kong adolescents. Acta Dermatol Venereol 2002;82:104-7.
[Google Scholar]
22.
Williams M, Cunliffe WJ. Explanation for premenstrual acne. Lancet 1973;2:1055-7.
[Google Scholar]
23.
Stoll S, Shalita AR, Webster GF, Kaplan R, Danesh S, Penstein A. The effect of the menstrual cycle on acne. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:957-60.
[Google Scholar]
24.
Khanna VN, Pandhi KR. Relationship of acne with menstrual period. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1991;57:138-40.
[Google Scholar]
25.
Walton S, Cunliffe WJ, Keczkes K, Early AS, McGarrigle HH, Katz M, Reese RA. Clinical, ultrasound and hormonal markers of androgenicity in acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1995;133:249-53.
[Google Scholar]
26.
Cibula D, Hill M, Vohradnikova O, Kuzel D, Fanta M, Zivny J. The role of androgens in determining acne severity in adult woman. Br J Dermatol 2000;143:399-404.
[Google Scholar]
27.
Borgia F, Cannavo S, Guarneri F, Cannavo SP, Vaccaro M, Guarneri B. Correlation between endocrinological parameters and acne severity in adult women. Acta Dermatol Venereol 2004;84:201-04.
[Google Scholar]
28.
Sheehan-Dare RA, Hughes BR, Cunliffe WJ. Clinical markers of androgenicity in acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 1988;119:723-30.
[Google Scholar]
29.
Reingold SB, Rosenfield RL. The Relationship of mild hirsutism or acne in women to androgens. Arch Dermatol 1987;123: 209-12.
[Google Scholar]
30.
Plewig G, Jansen T. Seborrheic dermatitis. In: Wolff K, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, editors. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General medicine, 7 th edn., New York: McGraw Hill Publishing; 2008. p. 219-25.
th edn., New York: McGraw Hill Publishing; 2008. p. 219-25.'>[Google Scholar]
31.
Peyrν J, Lleonart M; Grupo espaρol del Estudio SEBDERM. Clinical and therapeutic profile and quality of life of patients with seborrheic dermatitis. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007;98:476-82.
[Google Scholar]
32.
Mills CM, Peters TJ, Finlay AY. Does smoking influence acne? Clin Exp Dermatol 1993;18:100-1.
[Google Scholar]
33.
Rombouts S, Nijsten T, Lambert J. Cigarette smoking and acne in adolescents: Results from a cross-sectional study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21:326-33.
[Google Scholar]
34.
Schδfer T, Nienhaus A, Vieluf D, Berger J, Ring J. Epidemiology of acne in the general population: The risk of smoking. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:100-4.
[Google Scholar]
35.
Chuh AA, Zawar V, Wong WC, Lee A. The association of smoking and acne in men in Hong Kong and in India: A retrospective case-control study in primary care settings. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004; 29:597-99.
[Google Scholar]
36.
Sardana K, Sharma RC, Sarkar R. Seasonal variation in acne vulgaris-myth or reality. J Dermatol 2002;29:484-8.
[Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
4,347

PDF downloads
1,714
Show Sections