IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 893 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (97 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Introduction
   History of Skin ...
   Classification
   Uses of Skin Typing
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgment
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed16235    
    Printed180    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded1166    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 16    

Recommend this journal

 


 
RESIDENT'S PAGE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 75  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 93-96

Fitzpatrick skin typing: Applications in dermatology


International fellow Moh Surgery, Laser surgery and Cosmetic Dermatology, Dallas, Texas, USA

Correspondence Address:
Silonie Sachdeva
610 Heather trail, Arlington, Texas-760 11
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.45238

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Sachdeva S. Fitzpatrick skin typing: Applications in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:93-6

How to cite this URL:
Sachdeva S. Fitzpatrick skin typing: Applications in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Oct 22];75:93-6. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2009/75/1/93/45238



  Introduction Top


Fitzpatrick skin phototypes were developed by Thomas B. Fitzpatrick in 1975 based on a person's skin color and responses to sun exposure in terms of degree of burning and tanning. Though subjective, Fitzpatrick skin typing has a proven diagnostic and therapeutic value. It has been most commonly used to analyze the sun sensitivity in population-based and case-control studies related to cause of skin cancer, exposure to UV radiation, tanning, and protective behaviors. [1],[2] The Fitzpatrick scale has been applied as a standard for self-assessment of sun sensitivity in self-administered questionnaires and has been shown to correlate well for white skin as compared to brown skin. [3] Skin phototype typing is widely used for estimating UV, PUVA, and laser treatment doses.


  History of Skin Phototyping Top


Fitzpatrick first classified skin types I-III based on his outdoor sunscreen study [4] in Brisbane, Australia in 1972. He distributed skin responses of fair-skinned Australians who participated in his study of midday sun exposure into three main sun reactive categories: skin phototype I: those who burn easily and do not tan at all; skin phototype II: those who burn easily and tan with difficulty (freckled and often red-haired individuals); and skin phototype III: those who burn moderately, show immediate pigment darkening reactions, and tan moderately after about 60 minutes of midday sun exposure. Fitzpatrick's skin phototypes I, II, and III became well accepted and popular in dermatology for phototherapy of skin diseases. In 1972, the US FDA adopted this classification for the evaluation of sun protection factor (SPF) values of sunscreens.


  Classification Top


The current Fitzpatrick skin type classification [4] denotes six different skin types, skin color, and reaction to sun exposure which ranges from very fair (skin type I) to very dark (skin type VI) depending upon whether the patient burns at the first average sun exposure or tans at the first average sun exposure [Table 1]. The two main factors that influence skin type are:

  1. Genetic disposition
  2. Reaction to sun exposure and tanning habits


Skin type is determined genetically and is one of the many aspects of the overall appearance, which also includes color of eyes and hair. The way skin reacts to sun exposure is another important factor in correctly assessing the skin type. Recent tanning (sun bathing, artificial tanning, or tanning creams) has a major impact on the evaluation of the skin color. The Fitzpatrick scale is a numerical classification scheme for determining the skin color based on a questionnaire related to an individual's genetic constitution, reaction to sun exposure, and tanning habits. [5] The response to each question is measured on a scale of zero to four. The response for all the questions is added to get the final score corresponding to the Fitzpatrick skin type [Table 2],[Table 3],[Table 4],[Table 5]. Fitzpatrick scale is widely accepted to assess the patient's skin type.

The objective assessment of Fitzpatrick skin types can be done by a device Dermatone Skin Analyzer™, which gives accurate analysis of skin tones based on the skin's concentrations of melanin, hemoglobin, and skin reflection properties. [6] It has been developed by Dr. Kambiz Youabian at the Cosmetic Laser Center of Los Angeles. The device is portable and simple to use. To measure the skin tone, the tip of the device is gently placed over the skin and a button is pressed. The skin tone results are displayed on the device's LCD screen. The Dermatone skin tone readings have a scale varying from 35-127 corresponding to various Fitzpatrick skin types [Table 6].


  Uses of Skin Typing Top


Photoaging and risk of skin cancer

The role of melanin in the skin is to absorb and scatter energy from UV light to protect the epidermal cells from damage. Melanin provides considerable protection from sun damage, and the degree of protection corresponds directly to the degree of pigmentation. This sun protection offers significant prevention of photoaging in skin types IV-V. The skin types I-III are at increased risk of sun damage, photoaging, and risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. [1],[2] Fitzpatrick skin typing helps to predict the risk of photodamage and skin cancer.

Minimal erythema dose for UV phototherapy

Skin typing has been used to estimate the minimal erythema dose (MED) for initial dose in phototherapy. [7] Fitzpatrick skin types I-III have been shown to have lower MED compared to type IV-VI. The most common Indian skin type [8] has been found to be of type V followed by type IV and the estimated MED for UVB for Indian skin is 61.5 ± 17.25 J/cm. [2]

Laser hair removal

Evaluation of facial skin pigmentation before laser hair removal/ laser resurfacing is paramount to successful results. Pigment can be inherited ethnically or acquired as in melasma or Addison's disease. A higher degree of preablative pigmentation increases the risk of hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation after treatment. Thus, Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI run a greater risk of potential epidermal adverse events, such as dyspigmentation, blistering, crusting, edema, and subsequent scarring with laser hair removal. [9] Since, the energy fluence dose (J/cm2) used per pulse varies for different skin types, skin typing before the start of procedure can help to determine the safe and effective energy dose for laser hair removal in a particular skin type and can be useful in preventing complications. Also, to reduce epidermal melanin absorption of energy, longer wavelengths are considered safer for use on Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI.

Chemical peeling and dermabrasion

Patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III tolerate resurfacing procedures with minimal risk of pigmentary complications. They may develop prolonged postoperative erythema but are less likely to develop the pigmentary sequelae. In patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI, the risk of pigmentary change is higher with the deeper wounding that can be achieved with dermabrasion and chemical peeling. [10] The higher the type and the degree of pigmentation, the greater the risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.

Tolerance to topical bleaching agents

In Fitzpatrick skin types I-III, if any reaction to topical depigmenting agent occurs, the skin usually returns to normal on discontinuation of the product. In darker skin, frequent dryness and irritation are followed by postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. In predisposed individuals, hyperpigmentation usually develops within one to two weeks and can last for several months.


  Conclusion Top


Fitzpatrick skin typing helps to predict the possible sun damage in a person and the risk of skin cancer. It can also be used to evaluate the response of different skin types to commonly used cosmetic procedures and is therefore a useful tool in cosmetic dermatology.


  Acknowledgment Top


Dr. Kambiz Youabian, Cosmetic Laser Center of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA for letting use the information about Dermatone skin analyzer from his website

 
  References Top

1.Beral V, Evans S, Shaw H, Milton G. Cutaneous factors related to the risk of malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 1983;109:165-72.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Weinstock MA. Assessment of sun sensitivity by questionnaire: Validity of itemand formulation of a prediction rule. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:547-52.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Youn JI, Oh JK, Kim BK, Suh DH, Chung JH, Oh SJ, et al . Relationship between skin phototype and MED in Korean, brown skin. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1997;13:208-11.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Pathak MA. In memory of Thomas Bernhard Fitzpatrick. J Invest Dermatol 2004;122:20-1.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Fitzpatrick scale. Wikipedia. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitzpatrick_scale. [last updated on 2007 Aug 12]. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 12].  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Youabian K. Dermatome Skin Analyzer. Available from: http://www.cosmeticlasercenter.net/Dermatone.html. [last updated on 2007 Jan 1]. [last accessed on 2008 Feb 15].  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Andreassi L, Simoni S, Fiorini P, Fimiani M. Phenotypic characters related to skin type and minimal erythemal dose. Photodermatol 1987;4:43-6.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Pai GS, Vinod V, Krishna V. MED estimation for narrow band UV-B on type IV and type V skin in India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002;3:140-1.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Breadon JY, Barnes CA. Comparison of adverse events of laser and light-assisted hair removal systems in skin types IV-VI. J Drugs Dermatol 2007;6:40-6.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  
10.Grimes PE. Skin and hair cosmetic issues in women of color. Dermatol Clin 2000;18:659-65.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]

This article has been cited by
1 Maximum Incident Erythemally Effective UV Exposure Received by Construction Workers, in Valencia, Spain
Vicente Blanca Giménez,Gonzalo Gurrea Ysasi,Juan Carlos Moreno,María Antonia Serrano
Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2015; 91(6): 1505
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Mood disorders are associated with a more severe hypovitaminosis D than schizophrenia
Raoul Belzeaux,Laurent Boyer,El Chérif Ibrahim,François Féron,Marion Leboyer,Guillaume Fond
Psychiatry Research. 2015; 229(1-2): 613
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Ultraviolet light exposure, skin cancer risk and vitamin D production
Miguel Rivas,Elisa Rojas,Mar�a Araya,Gloria Calaf
Oncology Letters. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Effect of Dermal Thickness on Scars in Women with Type III–IV Fitzpatrick Skin
Bilsev Ince,Mehmet Dadaci,Pembe Oltulu,Zeynep Altuntas,Fatma Bilgen
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Assessment of the role of LASER-Doppler in the treatment of port-wine stains in infants
Tessa Mermod,Oumama El Ezzi,Wassim Raffoul,Paolo Erba,Anthony de Buys Roessingh
Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Determinación de la dosis eritemática mínima y reacciones anómalas a radiación ultravioleta A según fototipo
A. Pérez Ferriols,J. Aguilera,P. Aguilera,D. de Argila,M.A. Barnadas,X. de Cabo,J.M. Carrrascosa,M.V. de Gálvez Aranda,J. Gardeazábal,A. Giménez-Arnau,M. Lecha,J. Lorente,J.A. Martínez-Lozano,M.T. Rodríguez Granados,Y. Sola,M.P. Utrillas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Self-reported pigmentary phenotypes and race are significant but incomplete predictors of Fitzpatrick skin phototype in an ethnically diverse population
Steven Y. He,Charles E. McCulloch,W. John Boscardin,Mary-Margaret Chren,Eleni Linos,Sarah T. Arron
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Influence of external, intrinsic and individual behaviour variables on serum 25(OH)D in a German survey
Katja Richter,Susanne Breitner,Ann R. Webb,Cornelia Huth,Barbara Thorand,Richard Kift,Jakob Linseisen,Angela Schuh,Jürgen Kratzsch,Andreas Mielck,Stephan Weidinger,Annette Peters,Alexandra Schneider
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2014; 140: 120
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Determination of Minimal Erythema Dose and Anomalous Reactions to UVA Radiation by Skin Phototype
A. Pérez Ferriols,J. Aguilera,P. Aguilera,D. de Argila,M.A. Barnadas,X. de Cabo,J.M. Carrrascosa,M.V. de Gálvez Aranda,J. Gardeazábal,A. Giménez-Arnau,M. Lecha,J. Lorente,J.A. Martínez-Lozano,M.T. Rodríguez Granados,Y. Sola,M.P. Utrillas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition). 2014; 105(8): 780
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Safety and efficacy of modified Jessner’s solution versus 70% glycolic acid for the treatment of melasma in different skin types
Yehia F. El Garem,Heba A. Mahmoud,Mahmoud N. Kamel
Journal of the Egyptian Women's Dermatologic Society. 2014; 11(3): 159
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Photodermatoses in pigmented skin
Vinod Kumar Sharma,Kanika Sahni,Ashok Roopchand Wadhwani
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2013; 12(1): 65
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Host Risk Factors, Ultraviolet Index of Residence, and Incident Malignant Melanoma In Situ Among US Women and Men
A. C. Walls,J. Han,T. Li,A. A. Qureshi
American Journal of Epidemiology. 2013; 177(9): 997
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Optical coherent tomography: promising in vivo measurement of hair shaft cross section
Natalie Garcia Bartels, Karola Stieler, Heike Richter, Alexa Patzelt, Jürgen Lademann, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi
Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2011; 16(9): 096003
[VIEW] | [DOI]
14 Intense Pulsed Light Therapy
Barbara Soltes
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2010; 37(4): 489
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Photoallergy | [Fotoalergia]
Salgado, M., Reis, R., de Sousa, A.V., Tomaz, E., Dydenko, I., Ferrão, A., Ferreira, F., Inácio, F.
Revista Portuguesa de Imunoalergologia. 2010; 18(6): 493-538
[Pubmed]
16 Intense pulsed light therapy
Soltes, B.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2010; 37(4): 489-499
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow