IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 706 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (90 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2741    
    Printed49    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded204    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
NET LETTER
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 75  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 101

Polymerase chain reaction is no better than Gram stain for diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis


1 Department of Dermatology, Adan Hospital, Kuwait
2 Department of Microbiology, Adan Hospital, Kuwait

Correspondence Address:
Abdel-Hamid F El-Gamal
P.O.Box:2193 Al-qurain 47372
Kuwait
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.45243

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
El-Gamal AHF, Al-Otaibi SR, Alshamali A, Abdulrazzaq A, Najem N, Al. Fouzan A. Polymerase chain reaction is no better than Gram stain for diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:101

How to cite this URL:
El-Gamal AHF, Al-Otaibi SR, Alshamali A, Abdulrazzaq A, Najem N, Al. Fouzan A. Polymerase chain reaction is no better than Gram stain for diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2017 Sep 26];75:101. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2009/75/1/101/45243


Sir,

Chlamydia trachomatis and  Neisseria More Details gonorrhea are the leading reportable causes for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States. [1],[2] In UK, gonorrheal disease is considered the second most common sexually transmitted infection of bacterial origin. [3] In France, the average number of Neisseria gonorrhea isolated per laboratory per year decreased from 10.6 in 1986 to 0.6 in 1997, but then increased yearly to reach 1.9 in 2000. [4] Also, gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis are the most commonly reported STDs in China since the re-emergence of STDs in the late 1970's and early 1980's. [5]

Among individuals with gonorrheal infection, 3.3-37% of men had a chlamydial coinfection, and 12-28% of men with chlamydial infection had a gonorrheal coinfection. [6],[7] Although gonorrheal and chlamydial infections can be easily diagnosed, treated, and cured, the undetected and untreated infections lead to severe and costly health problems such as pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility in females; and testicular and prostate infections and infertility in males. [8]

At the national level of Kuwait, the information on reported cases of gonorrheal and chlamydial infections are limited and often missing. Hence, our goal is to determine the co-occurrence of both these diseases among men with urethral discharge as well as to establish the efficacy of PCR in the diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis.

This study was conducted in the STD clinic of Adan hospital, which is the referral to the whole south region of the state of Kuwait. Men attending STD clinics and currently having any of the STD symptoms (e.g., genital discharge, itching, burning or pain during urination) were examined and only those patients with urethral discharge and past history of heterosexual intercourse confirmed by clinical examination (visible or milking when necessary) were included in this study. Two urethral swab samples were taken. The swab was inserted 1-2 cm into the urethra and rotated for 30 seconds before withdrawing. One sample was smeared on a slide and examined after Gram staining and the other was stored at -20C to test for the presence of Neisseria gonorrhea and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR assay.

The study conducted between October 2005 and 2006 had a total of 475 newly registered cases of men complaining of urethral discharge with past history of heterosexual intercourse. The mean age of the patients was 32.5 years with standard deviation of 7.62 years (range: 17-61 years). Of the 475 patients, 125 (26.3%) were diagnosed with gonococcal urethritis, 47 (9.8%) were diagnosed with chlamydial urethritis, and 11 (2.31%) were diagnosed with coinfection of both Neisseria gonorrhea and Chlamydia trachomatis . The chlamydial coinfection among patients with gonorrheal urethritis was 8.1% (11/136), while gonorrheal coinfection among patients with chlamydial urethritis was 18.9% (11/58) [Table 1].

The correlation of the results of both Gram stain and PCR for diagnosis of gonorrhea, they agree in 134 cases (98-52%) of totally 136 diagnosed cases of gonorrhea, and disagree only in two of the cases (1.48%). The overall correlation between the two methods was 99.4%.

Consistent with previous studies, we found high proportions of individuals carrying both chlamydial and gonococcal infections among those infected with either of the two diseases. [6],[7],[9]

Consistent with our results, Juchau et al . [10] concluded that the correlation between PCR and Gram stain examination for diagnosis of gonorrhea was 99.6%. Thus, we conclude that there is no practical reason to use PCR examination for diagnosis of gonorrhea in symptomatic males owing to its high cost.

 
  References Top

1.Centers for disease control and prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2001. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.The Hidden Epidemic. Confronting sexually transmitted disease. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.GRASP steering group, the gonococcal resistance to antimicrobial surveillance program (GRASP) year 2001 report. London: Public Health Laboratory Service; 2002.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Herida M, Sednaoui P, Goulet V. Gonorrhea surveillance system in France: 1986-2000. Sex Trans Dis 2004;31:209-14.   Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Parish WL, Laumann EO, Cohen MS, Pan S, Zheng H, Hoffman I, et al . Population based study of Chlamydial infection in China: A hidden epidemic JAMA 2003;289:1265-73.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Dragovic B, Greaves K, Vashisht A, Straughair G, Sabin C, Smith NA. Chlamydia co-infection among patients with gonorrhea. Int J STD AIDS 2002;13:261-3.   Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
7.Creightons S, Tenant-flowers M, Taylor CB, Miller R, Low N. Co-infection with gonorrhea and Chlamydia: how much is there and what does it mean? Int J STD AIDS 2003;14:109-13.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Holmes KK, sparling PF, Per Anders M, et al , editors. Sexually transmitted diseases, 3rd ed. New York: McGerow - Hill, Professional; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Lyss SB, Kamb ML, Pelerman TA, Moran JS, Newman DR, Bolan G, et al . Chlamydia trachomatis among patients infected and treated for neisseria gonorrhea in sexually transmitted disease clinic in United States. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:178-85.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Juchau SV, Nakman R, Ruppard. Comparison of gram stain with DNA probe for detection of Neisseria gonorrhea in urethras of symptomatic males. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:3068-9.  Back to cited text no. 10    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow