IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 3748 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Article in PDF (562 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7469    
    Printed96    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded701    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal

 


 
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 74  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 467-470

Atopic patch testing


Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India

Correspondence Address:
D S Krupa Shankar
Department of Dermatology, Manipal Hospital, 98, Rustom Bagh, Airport Road, Bangalore-560 017
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.44301

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 

Background: Atopic dermatitis is a major problem among the urban population and it can be aggravated or triggered by various allergens. Atopic patch test can be used as a diagnostic tool in characterizing patients with allergen triggered atopic dermatitis. Aims: 1. Patch testing to reproduce an eczematous reaction by applying prick test allergens under occlussion on intact skin. 2. To find the allergen associated with atopic dermatitis. 3. To find the specific allergen which causes or exacerbates atopic dermatitis in a given subject. Methods: Seventy five subjects with atopic dermatitis were included in our study and patch tests using prick test allergens were applied to the back. Reading was done after 48 and 72hours Results: Out of the 75 subjects tested, 47% showed positive reactions, parthenium accounted for 42% of all positive reactions. Conclusions: Epicutaneous application of prick test antigen on intact skin can produce a reaction. Parthenium is commonest allergen in Bangalore. Counselling based on patch test reports may help to reduce morbidity and improve quality of life.


Keywords: Atopic dermatitis, Atopic patch, Prick test allergen, Skin prick test


How to cite this article:
Krupa Shankar D S, Chakravarthi M. Atopic patch testing. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:467-70

How to cite this URL:
Krupa Shankar D S, Chakravarthi M. Atopic patch testing. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Aug 23];74:467-70. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2008/74/5/467/44301



  Introduction Top


Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by intense itching and a relapsing course especially in infants and children with a personal or family history of atopic disorders.

Several new aspects with regard to the pathogenetic background as well as strategies for prevention, diagnosis and treatment in atopic dermatitis have emerged. There are ongoing studies on genetic susceptibility loci, as well as environmental and nutritional factors associated with an increase or a decrease of atopic dermatitis lesions. The atopic patch test is now available for identification of allergens in aeroallergen-triggered atopic dermatitis. [1]


  Methods Top


Seventy five subjects with atopic dermatitis fitting Hanifin and Rajka's criteria and elevated serum IgE were included in the study. Patients with active disease who had taken drugs like antihistamines during the last 1week, corticosteroids [2] systemically during the last 4 weeks and topically during the last 1 week or who were on immunomodulators-topical and oral, [3] beta blockers or tricyclic antidepressants or who had dermatitis over the test site or were pregnant were excluded from the study. Personal and family history of atopic disorder was sought.

Patch testing was done using prick test allergens in aluminium patch test chambers. The antigens are loaded in aluminium patch test chambers with filter paper using the dropper provided by the manufacturer. A drop from the dropper was approximately 1/16 ml. The test site was upper back. The antigens used were dust mites: D. farinae, D. pteronyssinus , [4] pollens of Cynodon dactylon and Parthenium hysterophorus , foods like rice, wheat, milk, egg and dog and cat epithelia. The reading was taken after 48 and 72 hours and interpretation and Grading of APT reaction was done according to the guidelines by European task force on atopic dermatitis consensus [Table 1]. [5]

Test material

The patch test solutions were aqueous allergens supplied by Creative Drug Industries (Allergology division, Navi Mumbai) containing 50% glycerine as stabilizing factor and preserved with 0.4% phenol with their strengths expressed in protein nitrogen units (PNU) and for food series expressed in weight by volume.

Dust mites i.e. Dermatophagoides farinae and D. pteronyssinus has 1500 PNU, all others ( Cynodon dactylon, Parthenium hysterophorus , dog and cat dander) has 5000 PNU. All food antigens have 1% weight by volume (w/v).

Aluminium patch test chamber was supplied by Systopic Laboratories, New Delhi.


  Results Top


Out of 75 subjects, 38 were males (51%) and 37 were females (49%) with mean age of 17.70 (1 to 64) years. Most of our study group belonged to the age group of 1 to 10 years [Figure 1]. Seventy per cent of the subjects gave a personal or family history of an atopic disorder [Figure 2]. The commonest site of involvement was cubital fossa followed by popliteal fossa [Figure 3].

Out of the 75 subjects tested 46.66% (35) showed positive reactions, 50.66% (38) had no reaction [Figure 4] and 2.66% (2) manifested angry back syndrome. While 28 subjects showed reaction to 1 antigen, 8 subjects showed reactions to 2 antigens.

Parthenium accounted for 42.8%(15) of all positive reactions followed by Cynodon 20%(7), D. farinae 14%(5), D. pteronyssinus 11%(4), Milk 9%(3) and 6%(2) each to wheat, egg, dog dander and cat dander and only one subject reacted to rice - 3%. [Figure 5].

Interestingly, among 15 parthenium APT positive subjects, 8 subjects were tested with the Indian Standard Series (ISS) and of these 6 subjects showed positive reaction to parthenium in ISS (delayed hypersensitivity).


  Discussion Top


Recent studies show that there is a marked rise in the incidence and prevalence of atopic dermatitis in India. In India, the prevalence of atopic dermatitis ranges between 10 - 15.6%. [6]

Atopic dermatitis can be diagnosed with Hanifin and Rajka's criteria. Kanwar and Handa had undertaken a study to validate Hanifin and Rajka's criteria and to assess the comparative efficacy of their criteria and the UK working party's diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in a hospital setting in North India. Hanifin and Rajka's criteria [sensitivity 96%, specificity 93.75%, positive predictive value 97% (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) 91.84%] had a statistical advantage over the UK working party's diagnostic criteria (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95.83%, PPV 97.75% and NPV 76.67%), with a P -value < 0.005. [7]

The correlation between the APT and the total and specific serum IgE suggests an important role for IgE in the reaction mechanism behind the APT. [8] Hence, we included only those subjects who had elevated total serum IgE.

Dust mites are considered to be the most important triggering agent for atopic dermatitis. [9] In a study conducted in Croatia by Kuljanac et al, on Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus with APT and concluded that APT may detect the trigger factor in atopic dermatitis patients. [10]

Cow milk and hen egg allergy are the most important food allergies in atopic dermatitis, [11],[12] avoidance resulted in the clinical improvement. Parthenium hysterophorus is the most important antigen in India with both type I and type IV hypersensitivity. [13] Both types I and IV hypersensitivity may play a role in parthenium associated atopic dermatitis as evidenced by reaction to both atopic patch test and to Indian standard series patch test. [13]

Cynodon dactylon , also called Bermuda grass, has the potency of triggering atopic dermatitis. [14] Pet dander especially cat and dog dander should also be considered. [14]

A study conducted in Germany regarding pre-treatment of atopic dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream concluded that APT can be used as a model for atopic dermatitis skin inflammation. [3] Pimecrolimus pre-treatment has a potential to suppress the development of lesions induced by aeroallergen exposure in patients with atopic dermatitis. [3]

The atopic patch test (APT) involves the epicutaneous application of intact protein allergens in a diagnostic patch test setting with an evaluation of the induced eczematous skin lesions after 48 and 72 hours. The APT targets the cellular component of atopic dermatitis and helps complete out the atopic dermatitis test spectrum. As a number of apparently minor test modifications greatly influence the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the APT, the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) has developed a standardized APT technique. [15] Aeroallergens and food allergens are able to elicit eczematous skin reactions after epicutaneous application. [16]

Presence of at least seven papules after 72 h was the APT skin sign with the greatest diagnostic accuracy for food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis. [16]

Counselling on avoidance of allergen based on APT can reduce the morbidity and can reduce the drug load. Immunotherapy for aeroallergens can be considered.

Advantages of APT over skin prick tests are that: it can be tested at a younger age, risk of anaphylaxis is low and the specificity is high. Disadvantages are sensitivity is lower than SPT, it is time consuming and only a few antigens can be tested at a time.

To date, no "gold standard" exists for the provocation of reactions in aeroallergen triggered atopic dermatitis and APT has not been standardised. Further analysis and comparison with skin prick testing and RAST should be done in a controlled study.

The relevance of allergens for atopic dermatitis flares may be evaluated by APT in addition to skin prick test. Both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity may play a role in parthenium associated atopic dermatitis. Counselling based on patch test reports may help to reduce morbidity and improve quality of life. In our study, parthenium was found to be the commonest allergen in Bangalore.

 
  References Top

1.Mφhrenschlager M, Darsow U, Schnopp C, Ring J. Atopic eczema: What's new? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:503-11,513.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Langeveld-Wildschut EG, Riedl H, Thepen T, Bihari IC, Bruijnzeel PL, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA. Modulation of the atopy patch test reaction by topical corticosteroids and tar. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;106:737-43.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Weissenbacher S, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Eyerich K, Katzer K, Braeutigam M, Loeffler H, et al . Modulation of atopy patch test and skin prick test by pre-treatment with 1% pimecrolimus cream. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2006;140:239-44.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Ingordo V, Dalle Nogare R, Colecchia B, D'Andria C. Is the atopy patch test with house dust mites specific for atopic dermatitis? Dermatology 2004;209:276-83.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Darsow U, Ring J. The atopy patch test in atopic dermatitis. In: Lachapelle JM, Maibach HI, editors. Patch testing and Prick testing A practical guide. 1 st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2003. p. 103-10.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Sarkar R, Kanwar AJ. Atopic Dermatitis. Indian Pediatr 2002;39:922-30.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.De D, Kanwar AJ, Handa S. Comparative efficacy of Hanifin and Rajka's criteria and the UK working party's diagnostic criteria in diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in a hospital setting in North India. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:853-9.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Langeveld-Wildschut EG, van Marion AM, Thepen T, Mudde GC, Bruijnzeel PL, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA. Evaluation of variables influencing the outcome of the atopy patch test. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;96:66-73.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Barnetson RS, Macfarlane HA, Benton EC. House dust mite allergy and atopic eczema: A case report. Br J Dermatol 1987;116:857-60.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Kuljanac I, Milavec-Puretiζ V. Atopy patch test with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp 1) in atopic dermatitis patients. Coll Antropol 2006;30:181-3.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Burks AW, James JM, Hiegel A, Wilson G, Wheeler JG, Jones SM, et al . Atopic dermatitis and food hypersensitivity reactions. J Pediatr 1998;132:132-6.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Heine RG, Verstege A, Mehl A, Staden U, Rolinck-Werninghaus C, Niggemann B. Proposal for a standardized interpretation of the atopy patch test in children with atopic dermatitis and suspected food allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2006;17:213-7.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Lakshmi C, Srinivas CR. Type I hypersensitivity to Parthenium hysterophorus in patients with parthenium dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007;73:103-5.   Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal
14.Montealegre F, Meyer B, Chardon D, Vargas W, Zavala D, Hart B, et al . Comparative prevalence of sensitization to common animal, plant and mould allergens in subjects with asthma, or atopic dermatitis and/or allergic rhinitis living in a tropical environment. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:51-8.   Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Kerschenlohr K, Darsow U, Burgdorf WH, Ring J, Wollenberg A. Lessons from atopy patch testing in atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2004;4:285-9.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Weissenbacher S, Bacon T, Targett D, Behrendt H, Ring J, Darsow U. Atopy patch test--reproducibility and elicitation of itch in different application sites. Acta Dermatol Venereol 2005;85:147-51.  Back to cited text no. 16    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis
Robert Sidbury,Wynnis L. Tom,James N. Bergman,Kevin D. Cooper,Robert A. Silverman,Timothy G. Berger,Sarah L. Chamlin,David E. Cohen,Kelly M. Cordoro,Dawn M. Davis,Steven R. Feldman,Jon M. Hanifin,Alfons Krol,David J. Margolis,Amy S. Paller,Kathryn Schwarzenberger,Eric L. Simpson,Hywel C. Williams,Craig A. Elmets,Julie Block,Christopher G. Harrod,Wendy Smith Begolka,Lawrence F. Eichenfield
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Atopic dermatitis in infants and children in India
Dhar, S., Banerjee, R.
Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 2010; 76(5): 504-513
[Pubmed]
3 Pediatric contact dermatitis
Sharma, V.K., Asati, D.P.
Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 2010; 76(5): 514-520
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow