IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 3482 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Article in PDF (139 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6486    
    Printed103    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded557    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal

 


 
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 74  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 352-356

Fine needle aspiration cytology in leprosy


1 Department of Dermatology Venereology and Leprosy, Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar-608 002, India
2 Department of Pathology, Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar-608 002, India
3 Department of Microbiology, Rajah Muthiah Medical College and Hospital, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar-608 002, India

Correspondence Address:
PVS Prasad
88 AUTA Nagar, Sivapuri Post, Annamalai Nagar-608 002, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.42902

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 

Background: Laboratory diagnosis of leprosy by slit skin smear and skin biopsy is simple but both techniques have their own limitations. Slit skin smear is negative in paucibacillary cases whereas skin biopsy is an invasive technique. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from skin lesions in leprosy with subsequent staining with May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) stain has been found useful. Aim: To evaluate the possible role of cytology in classifying leprosy patients. Methods: Seventy-five untreated cases of leprosy attending the outpatient department were evaluated. Smears were taken from their skin lesions and stained using the MGG technique. Skin biopsy was also done from the lesions, which was compared with cytology smears. Results: A correlation of clinical features with FNAC was noticed in 87.5% of TT, 92.1% of BT, 81% of BL, and 66% of LL cases. Correlation of clinical with histopathological diagnoses revealed 12.5% specificity in TT leprosy, 55.3% in BT, 52.4% in BL and 50% in LL, and 100% in neuritic and histoid leprosy cases. Both correlations were found to be statistically significant by paired t test analysis. Thus, it was possible to distinguish the tuberculoid types by the presence of epithelioid cells and the lepromatous types by the presence of lymphocytes and foamy macrophages. Conclusion: FNAC may be used to categorize the patients into paucibacillary and multibacillary types, but is not a very sensitive tool to classify the patients across the Ridley-Jopling spectrum.


Keywords: Fine needle aspiration cytology, Hansen′s disease, Leprosy, Mycobacterium leprae, Skin biopsy


How to cite this article:
Prasad P, George RV, Kaviarasan P K, Viswanathan P, Tippoo R, Anandhi C. Fine needle aspiration cytology in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:352-6

How to cite this URL:
Prasad P, George RV, Kaviarasan P K, Viswanathan P, Tippoo R, Anandhi C. Fine needle aspiration cytology in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Sep 16];74:352-6. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2008/74/4/352/42902



  Introduction Top


The Ridley-Jopling (RJ) classification currently in use for classifying leprosy is based on widely acknowledged clinical, bacteriological, immunological, and histological parameters. [1],[2],[3],[4] It divides the leprosy spectrum into 'five' clinically and histologically recognizable groups. Application of the RJ scale in the classification of leprosy helps in understanding the immunology of the patient to predict prognosis and possible complications. But, histopathological investigation is an invasive procedure and leads to a biopsy scar, which may not be cosmetically acceptable. Slit skin smear technique stained with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) is considered as a simple field procedure for the diagnosis of leprosy. However, its application is limited to the determination of the presence or absence of acid fast bacilli (AFB).

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a safe and noninvasive procedure. The first recorded utilization of this technique is available from St. Bartholomew's hospital in the year 1833. Later, Sir James Paget widely used this technique. [5] In 1989, Ridley used ZN stain to study the nature of the exudates and to assess their cytology. [6] In 1994, Singh et al , used FNAC to diagnose a case of nodular lepromatous leprosy [7] and later used the same technique in 30 leprosy cases. [8] We undertook the present study to evaluate the possible utility of cytology in classifying lesions of leprosy on the R-J scale.


  Methods Top


This study included all new leprosy patients attending the outpatient department of the Rajah Muthiah Medical College Hospital during a one-year period. Two independent assessors, including the investigator, confirmed the clinical diagnosis. Skin lesions were examined for their number, size, shape, margin, erythema, border, infiltration, dryness, and loss of hair and sensation. Similarly, all peripheral and cutaneous nerves were palpated for their number, size, nodularity, abscess formation, and tenderness. These findings were entered in a chart. Patients were classified according to RJ criteria into tuberculoid (TT), borderline tuberculoid (BT), mid-borderline (BB), borderline lepromatous (BL), and lepromatous (LL) types. Slit skin smears were done for all patients followed by staining using the Z-N technique by a microbiologist. Skin biopsy was performed in all patients and two pathologists reported them independently. Histological classification of leprosy was based on standard histopathological criteria defined by Ridley. [9] This involved the evaluation of cell types composing the granulomas, i.e ., epithelioid cell or macrophage, cellular infiltrate containing lymphocytes, and bacterial load in Fite's stain.

FNAC was done from skin lesions after obtaining informed consent. The site was cleaned with alcohol and an assistant pinched the skin for 30 seconds to blanch the skin, as done in the slit skin smear technique. A 20 mL syringe was fitted with a 21-gauge needle and the assistant created negative pressure by holding back the piston with the forefinger and index finger of the right hand. The aspirated material was transferred onto glass slides. The flat surface of another slide was used to smear the material. The smears were air-dried and stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) stain. Cytological smears were coded and independently assessed by two pathologists who were not informed about the classification of the patients according to the R-J scale. Cytological specimens were considered adequate if there was a cellular yield of inflammatory cells. We followed the criteria laid down by Singh et al, in reporting the cytology smears after adopting a few modifications [8] given in [Table 1]. The results were analyzed using t test.


  Results Top


One hundred five cases out of a total of 21,850 patients who attended the outpatient department during the study period were new leprosy cases. Out of these, 75 patients, who were willing to undergo the study procedures, were selected for the study. The total number of leprosy cases comprised 0.48% of the dermatology outpatient population. Their ages were 4-72 years with a mean age of 31.2 years. Most patients belonged to the 21-40 years' age group. There were 53 males including three male children and 22 females including three female children; the male: female ratio was 2.4:1. The shortest duration of the disease was one month in fourteen patients whereas the longest duration was ten years in a tuberculoid leprosy patient. The correlation of classification of the patients using clinical features with the FNAC findings and histopathological findings is shown in [Table 2],[Table 3],[Table 4],[Table 5].

Correlation of clinical diagnosis with features of FNAC

Comparing clinical and FNAC features revealed that out of eight cases of TT leprosy, seven cases (87.5%) fulfilled the criteria while epithelioid cells were also seen in one case. Among 38 cases of BT leprosy, 32 cases (92.1%) showed epithelioid cells in addition to lymphocytes. Three cases showed predominantly epithelioid cells while the rest showed nonspecific changes.

Of the 21 cases of BL leprosy, 13 cases (81%) showed many lymphocytes and a few foamy macrophages without epithelioid cells, whereas there were predominantly foamy macrophages with a few lymphocytes in four cases. In four other patients, FNAC revealed a mixture of all cells including a few epithelioid cells. Out of six cases of LL, four cases (66%) showed foamy macrophages and a few lymphocytes [Figure 1] and the remaining showed only a few lymphocytes.

A histoid leprosy patient showed elongated, spindle-shaped cells along with scattered lymphocytes; Fite's stain was strongly positive. A purely neuritic leprosy patient showed scattered lymphocytes along with benign, spindle-shaped cells and adipose tissue in the FNAC from the nerve.

Correlation of clinical and histopathological features

On correlating FNAC with the histopathology of skin lesions, we found that out of three patients who had been histopathologically confirmed as TT, only one showed epithelioid cells but no cohesive epithelioid cell granuloma. The second patient showed a few lymphocytes and the third many lymphocytes and histiocytes. Hence, this correlation does not have any statistical significance. Among 30 BT patients, 50% showed lymphocytes and epithelioid cell transformation. The remaining showed a mixed picture. Out of 12 BL patients, ten patients showed a mixture of foamy macrophages, histiocytes, and lymphocytes. Five out of seven LL patients showed foamy macrophages with a few lymphocytes [Figure 1].

Among the 18 patients diagnosed as having indeterminate leprosy by histopathological examination, 14 patients showed a few lymphocytes with epithelioid cells and histiocytes while a few lymphocytes and macrophages were seen in the remaining cases.

Correlations among clinical and histological diagnoses and FNAC are shown in [Table 6], which shows a variation from 12.5-92%.


  Discussion Top


In our study, various types of skin lesions such as macules, infiltrated papules, plaques, and nodules were observed. Out of 75 biopsies including one nerve biopsy, histological evidence of leprosy was absent in only three cases, which could be due to inadequate representation of the biopsy site.

Correlation of clinical diagnoses with FNAC examination revealed varying results contrary to expectations. We could not observe organized granulomas reported by Singh et al . [8] We did however, notice a very high correlation between clinical diagnoses and FNAC in all types of leprosy. Singh et al , [8] did not differentiate between TT and BT leprosy while we noticed organized collections of epithelioid cells in one case, which was highly consistent with BT. Correlation was also high in BL and LL types where there were scanty cellular infiltrates and more foamy macrophages. Macular lesions are common in leprosy cases in India. We also observed macules in 42.5% of our study cases, which could be responsible for the poor cellularity observed in cytology. This was also observed in the earlier study by Singh et al . [8]

Thus, it was possible to distinguish tuberculoid types by the presence of epithelioid cells and lepromatous types by the presence of lymphocytes and foamy macrophages.

Ridley [6] examined cellular exudates in slit skin smears by the Z-N technique for AFB and observed that this generated more information on the immune status of the patient than the estimation of BI and MI alone. However, Z-N staining does not provide morphological details comparable to MGG. [8]

Singh et al , opined that cytological features of LL showed negative images of M. leprae on MGG-stained smears, which were later confirmed by AFB staining, [8] but not observed in the present study. On FNAC, we could not appreciate cohesive epithelioid cell granulomas with lymphocytes in tuberculoid spectrum. Lymphocytes form a major part of smears in the borderline types of the disease. In this study also, we found the largest number of lymphocytes in BL leprosy. Fite's stain from FNAC was also positive in one case of 'histioid' leprosy, which should stimulate interest for future studies. Application of histological criteria to cytological smears did not give us the expected results observed by others, [8] hence, we could not agree that the diagnosis and classification of leprosy were simplified by cytology.

Correlation of clinical with histopathological diagnoses was 12.5-50% in various types of leprosy in our study but 60-80% in earlier studies. [9],[10] Niranjana Murthy et al , observed a maximum correlation in BL and LL cases, [10] whereas this was only true in BT, BL, and LL cases in our study. Eighteen cases (24%) were histologically diagnosed as indeterminate and were clinically classified into various types depending on the number and type of skin lesions, which could explain the difference in the results in our study. Recently, in a comparative evaluation of skin and nerve histopathology in single skin lesion leprosy in 27 patients, the clinicopathological correlation was found to be positive in 51.85% of skin biopsy specimens. [11]

As we have only adopted the R-J scale for classification, indeterminate cases did not form a part of our clinical classification. However, indeterminate cases were diagnosed histologically in 18 cases, out of which 14 patients showed evidence of a tuberculoid spectrum and four cases showed a lepromatous spectrum by FNAC. This finding correlated with clinical diagnoses.

From this study, we conclude that FNAC only supplements histopathological diagnosis in some cases and can not be taken as a sensitive investigation for the diagnosis of leprosy. However, it has excellent value in patients who are not willing to undergo a biopsy and also serves to classify the patients quickly into pauci- or multibacillary types while awaiting the final pathology results. FNAC is a simple, cost-effective method of investigation that is more useful in TT and LL patients.

 
  References Top

1.Jopling WH, McDougall AC. Definition, epidemiology and world distribution. In: Jopling WH, McDougall AC, editors. Handbook of Leprosy. 5 th ed. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1996. p. 1.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Noordeen SK. The epidemiology of leprosy. In: Hastings RC editor. Leprosy 2 nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 29-45.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.WHO Expert committee on leprosy 1988 Sixth report. Technical Report Series 768, Geneva: World Health Organization.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Ridley DS, Jopling WH. Classification of leprosy according to immunity: A five group system. Int J Lepr 1966;34:255-73.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: A review. Hum Pathol 1983;14:9-28.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Ridley MJ. The cellular exudate: Mycobacterium leprae relationship and the critical reading of slit smears. Lepr Rev 1989;60:229-40.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Singh N, Arora VK, Ramam M. Nodular lepromatous leprosy: Report of a case diagnosed by FNA. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;11:373-5.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Singh N, Bhatia A, Gupta K, Ramam M. Cytomorphology of Leprosy across the Ridley-Jopling spectrum. Acta Cytol 1996;40:719-23.   Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Nayak SV, Shivarudrappa AS, Nagarajappa AH, Sacchidanand S, Ahmed SM. Role of modified rapid AFB method in histopathological sections of Hansen's disease. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:173-4.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Moorthy BN, Kumar P, Chatura KR, Chandrasekhar, Basavaraja. Histopathological correlation of skin biopsies in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2001;61:299-301.   Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Reddy RR, Singh G, Sacchidanand S, Okade R, Shivakumar V, Uday A, et al . Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005;71:401-5.  Back to cited text no. 11    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]

This article has been cited by
1 Histoid leprosy: review of the literature
Sunil Kumar Gupta
International Journal of Dermatology. 2015; 54(11): 1283
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Diagnosis of Pure Neuritic Leprosy
Bipin Kumar, Anju Pradhan
Pathology Research International. 2011; 2011: 1
[VIEW] | [DOI]
3 Cytological diagnosis in a case of histoid leprosy
Chufal, S.S., Mannan, R., Singh, M., Yadav, S.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2010; 4(5): 3221-3224
[Pubmed]
4 Modified fine-needle aspiration technique for diagnosis of granulomatous skin lesions with special reference to leprosy and cutaneous tuberculosis
Mehdi, G., Maheshwari, V., Ansari, H.A., Saxena, S., Sharma, R.
Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2010; 38(6): 391-396
[Pubmed]
5 Modified fine-needle aspiration technique for diagnosis of granulomatous skin lesions with special reference to leprosy and cutaneous tuberculosis
Ghazala Mehdi,Veena Maheshwari,Hena A. Ansari,Sonal Saxena,Rajeev Sharma
Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2009; : NA
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow