IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 470 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Article in PDF (109 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
   Introduction
   Case report
   Discussion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5360    
    Printed79    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded156    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal

 


 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 72  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 452-453

Condom leukoderma


Department of Dermatology, University College of Medicine and Goenka Hospital, Kolkata, India

Correspondence Address:
Raghubir Banerjee
120, Apcar Gardens, Asansol - 713304
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.29345

Rights and Permissions

  Abstract 

Contact dermatitis from natural latex of condom has been reported and is attributed to latex sensitivity. Chemical leukoderma from rubber condom is probably not reported. Here we present a case of chemical leukoderma in a 32-year-old male who developed depigmentation around the shaft of the penis in a circumferential pattern. Since the lesion was solitary and the site corresponded to the point of maximum contact of the condom, a diagnosis of contact leukoderma due to latex condom was thought of. Patch testing was done with mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), dusting powder present in the condom, and condom latex as such. The patient tested positive (3+) with mercaptobenzothiazole and the condom latex. On discontinuation of condom use and with UVB phototherapy, lesions repigmented in eight weeks.


Keywords: Contact leukoderma, Latex sensitivity


How to cite this article:
Banerjee R, Banerjee K, Datta A. Condom leukoderma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:452-3

How to cite this URL:
Banerjee R, Banerjee K, Datta A. Condom leukoderma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Oct 16];72:452-3. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2006/72/6/452/29345



  Introduction Top


Contact dermatitis from natural latex of condom has been reported and is attributed to latex sensitivity. Here we report a case of chemical leukoderma around the shaft of the penis in a circumferential pattern due to the use of condom.


  Case report Top


A 32-year-old married male patient presented with ring-shaped depigmentation around the penile shaft for a duration of six months. On examination, a linear circular band of depigmentation was seen around the shaft of the penis [Figure - 1]. The presence of depigmented macules raised a possibility of vitiligo but the patient did not have any other patch anywhere else on the body. Hence we suspected contact sensitization being the cause of such a lesion. He was married for the last two years and admitted that he was using a condom regularly. He denied using any spermicidal jelly and mentioned using soap after the intercourse.

Patch testing was done with mercaptobenzothiazole, condom dusting powder present in the condom, condom latex as such and the report was observed after 72h. The patient tested positive (3+) with MBT and the condom latex.

The patient was advised to discontinue usage of condom and was offered the option of oral contraceptive pills for his wife. He was treated with ultraviolet B therapy with complete repigmentation in eight weeks.


  Discussion Top


Western dermatological literature reports penile edema and pelvic and scrotal dermatitis from use of condoms.[1],[2] By repeated patch testing they have identified materials like zinc MBT, polytrimethyl hydroquinolone, P. toluenediamine and Zinc diethyldithiocarbamate, lubricants, jellies, perfumes, natural gum, methacol, carbopol, methyl and butyl parabens preservatives as allergens producing contact dermatitis of genitalia for both sexual partners. Silicone lubricants containing perfumes and preservative powder and sometimes powder containing 10% MBT were often found to produce dermatitis.[2],[3],[4]

Nonrubber condoms made from natural processed sheep intestine or caecum are used in western countries to overcome this problem.[5] The Indian scenario is quite different where the government supplies rubber or latex condoms for birth control and AIDS prevention. Contact with rubber materials has been known to produce depigmentation. Friction and close contact of the shaft of the penis with the rubber condom during repeated sexual activities is likely to produce irritation and rarely, as in our case, subsequent depigmentation when used over a prolonged period of time. In the present case depigmentation improved readily on discontinuation of the suspected contactant.

 
  References Top

1.Cronin E. Rubber. Chapter 14. In : Cronin E, editor. Contact dermatitis. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1980, p. 714.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Fisher AA. Dermatitis from rubber, adhesives and gums. Chapter 10. In: Fisher AA, editor. Contact Dermatitis, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1973, p. 448.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Fisher AA. Allergic reactions to contraceptives. Cutis 1974;13:337.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Fisher AA. Vulvitis due to contactants. Cutis 1974;13:725.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Fisher AA. Consort contact dermatitis. Cutis 1979;24:595.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  


    Figures

[Figure - 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Effect of chemical exposure in induction and evolution of vitiligo: Correlation between duration of exposure and disease, site of exposure and onset, and impact upon avoidance
Mahboob Alam,Sanjay Ghosh
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2015; 3: S91
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Chemical leucoderma: Indian scenario, prognosis, and treatment
Bajaj, A.K., Saraswat, A., Srivastav, P.
Indian Journal of Dermatology. 2010; 55(3): 250-254
[Pubmed]
3 Appraisal of the sensitising potential of orally and dermally administered Mercaptobenzothiazol by a biphasic protocol of the local lymph node assay
Ahuja, V., Wanner, R., Platzek, T., Stahlmann, R.
Archives of Toxicology. 2009; 83(10): 933-939
[Pubmed]
4 Appraisal of the sensitising potential of orally and dermally administered Mercaptobenzothiazol by a biphasic protocol of the local lymph node assay
Varun Ahuja,Reinhard Wanner,Thomas Platzek,Ralf Stahlmann
Archives of Toxicology. 2009; 83(10): 933
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow