Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
Users online: 4386 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Article in PDF (173 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
   Materials and Me...
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded284    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 11    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2005  |  Volume : 71  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 250-253

Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: A histopathological study

1 Departments of Dermatology, Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Departments of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Sanjay K Rathi
Dr. Rathi's Skin Clinic, 143, Hill Cart Road, Siliguri - 734401, W. Bengal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.16616

Rights and Permissions


BACKGROUND : Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis follows an attack of visceral leishmaniasis and is caused by the same organism, i.e. Leishmania donovani. METHODS: In the present study, biopsy specimens from hypopigmented macules, nodules or plaques of 25 patients clinically diagnosed as PKDL were evaluated for epidermal and dermal changes and for the presence or absence of Leishmania donovani bodies (LDBs). RESULTS : The hypopigmented macules showed a patchy perivascular and periappendageal infiltrate with no demonstrable LDBs in any of the biopsies. In the nodular and plaque lesions, the infiltrate was diffuse, beneath an atrophic epidermis (74%) and follicular plugging (95.6%) was seen in most biopsies. The infiltrate consisted of lymphocytes, histiocytes and plasma cells in decreasing order of presence. LDBs could be demonstrated in only 10 (43.5%) biopsy specimens from nodular and plaque lesions and were never numerous. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathological features of PKDL are elucidated and discussed.

Keywords: Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis, Hypopigmented macules, Nodules, Plaques, Histopathology

How to cite this article:
Rathi SK, Pandhi R K, Chopra P, Khanna N. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: A histopathological study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005;71:250-3

How to cite this URL:
Rathi SK, Pandhi R K, Chopra P, Khanna N. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: A histopathological study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2005 [cited 2020 Aug 14];71:250-3. Available from:

  Introduction Top

Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) usually develops 6 months-5 years following an attack of untreated or incompletely treated visceral leishmaniasis (VL).[1],[2] Both PKDL and VL are caused by the same organism, a protozoa, Leishmania donovani .[3] Three types of clinical manifestations have been described in PKDL: hypopigmented macules, nodules and plaques and erythema of face. Though not an infrequent disease in endemic areas, there is paucity of reports on the histopathological findings in PKDL. The present study focuses on the histopathology of the hypopigmented macules, nodules and plaques of patients with PKDL.

  Materials and Methods Top

Twenty-five patients with clinical lesions suggestive of PKDL (macules, nodules and plaques) who attended the Dermatology OPD of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi over a period of two years were recruited in the present study. Tissue smears were made from both types of skin lesions and stained with Giemsa stain to demonstrate Leishmania Donovani bodies (LDBs). Slit-skin smears for acid-fast bacilli were also made, to rule out leprosy.

The biopsy specimens were taken from a macule, nodule or plaque depending on the clinical presentation of the patient. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and special stains, Fite (for demonstration of AFB), and Giemsa (for demonstration of LDBs) and examined for:

Epidermal changes, if any.

Dermal changes, including intensity, pattern and type of inflammatory cell infiltrate. The intensity of the infiltrate was graded subjectively from nil to mild, mild to moderate and moderate to heavy. Presence or absence of LDBs.

  Results Top

The 25 patients included 22 (88%) males and 3 (12%) females. Their age ranged from 6 to 55 years. Twenty (80%) patients gave a history of preceding Kala-azar.

Morphological profile

Two main morphological types of lesions were seen: hypopigmented macules, nodules and plaques. Two (8%) patients had only macules, 5 (20%) only nodules and plaques, while 18 (72%) had all types of lesions.

Tissue smear

LDBs were demonstrated either within or outside the macrophages by Giemsa stained smears from infiltrated plaques and nodules in 11 (47.8%) of 23 patients, but in none of the macular lesions in the 20 patients who had such lesions. Slit-skin smears for acid-fast bacilli were negative in all cases.

Histopathological features

Forty-three biopsy specimens were processed, 20 from macules and 23 from nodules.

Epidermal changes

Five (20%) of the 20 biopsies taken from the macules and 17 (74%) of the 23 biopsies from nodules showed epidermal atrophy [Figure - 1]. Twenty-two (95.6%) biopsies from infiltrated nodules and plaques [Figure - 1] and 9 (45%) from macules showed follicular plugging, especially in lesions from the face and axillary folds.

Dermal changes

Nineteen (83%) of the 23 biopsies from nodules had a moderate to heavy diffuse dermal infiltrate [Table - 1] while 4 (17%) biopsy specimens showed a mild-moderate patchy infiltrate. In 11 (55%) biopsies from macular lesions, the infiltrate was patchy. When the infiltrate was diffuse, it was located mainly in the upper and mid-dermis while the patchy infiltrate was perivascular and periappendageal [Figure - 2]. [Table - 1] shows the amount of infiltrate in macular lesions, nodules and plaques. The infiltrate consisted predominantly of lymphohistiocytes admixed with plasma cells. When the infiltrate was moderate to heavy, plasma cells were inconspicuous; on the other hand, when the infiltrate was mild to moderate, plasma cells were conspicuous both in the macules and infiltrated lesions [Table - 2].

A subepidermal clear zone, was seen in 11 (48%) biopsy specimens from nodules [Figure - 3] and in 3 (15%) specimens from macules. Pigment incontinence was seen in 10 (43%) biopsy specimens taken from nodules and in 5 (25%) from macules.

Special stains

LDBs either within the histiocytes or extracellularly could be demonstrated in 10 (40%) biopsy specimens from nodules/plaques. LDBs were never numerous and were mainly seen in the upper and mid-dermis and only after a thorough search. No LDBs could be demonstrated in macular lesions. Giemsa staining did not have any advantages over H/E staining in demonstrating LDBs. The Fite stain for M. leprae was negative in all patients.

  Discussion Top

PKDL is the sequel of untreated or partially treated KA which characteristically manifests as macules, nodules, plaques and facial erythema. A minimal mixed chronic inflammatory infiltrate consisting of plasma cells, lymphocytes and histiocytes in the perivascular areas of the upper dermis has been described in macules of PKDL.[1],[2],[3],[4] In our study, the infiltrate consisted mainly of lymphocytes, histiocytes and occasional plasma cells, corroborating the findings of Singh[5] and Ramesh et al.[6] Pigment dilution in basal layers has also been reported in macules.[7] We found atrophy (25%) and follicular plugging (45%) as additional epidermal changes in the macular lesions.

As regards the infiltrated nodules and plaques, the findings of earlier studies have varied from a macrophage granuloma with heavy parasitization to an epithelioid cell granuloma with minimal presence of LDBs.[2],[3],[5],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] The granuloma generally comprises lymphocytes, histiocytes and plasma cells in varying proportions. Singh et al described a dense inflammatory infiltrate of mononuclear cells, histiocytes and plasma cells with sparse LDBs in the upper dermis, and a narrow sub-epidermal Grenz zone.[10] The epidermis was atrophic and follicular plugging was a prominent feature. This suggests a spectrum of histopathological findings in PKDL.

In our study, epidermal atrophy (74%) and follicular plugging (95.6%) were conspicuous in a vast majority of nodular lesions. In the dermis, a Grenz zone was seen in almost (48%) half of the specimens along with diffuse infiltrate (83%) which was placed in the upper and mid-dermis. The infiltrate consisted of lymphocytes, admixed with histiocytes and plasma cells, but there was no tendency to granuloma formation. Mukherjee et al[11] and Ramesh et al[6] reported that plasma cells were the most predominant cells in the biopsy specimens of nodules, but our study did not corroborate this observation. Interestingly, we observed that plasma cells were more conspicuous when the infiltrate was sparse. Pigment incontinence was seen in 43% of the nodular lesions.

In earlier studies, the number of LDBs has not been large, and, more importantly, their number was not compatible with the extent and type of skin lesions. Our findings support this, as in 52% of patients, LDBs could not be demonstrated, even from the nodular lesions. This paucity of LDBs may be explained by the leishmanicidal effect of rifampicin, which is often prescribed in these patients due to concomitant tuberculosis or even for their PKDL. Another reason could be the good host-parasite relationship that allows the organism to lie dormant until conditions favor its multiplication.[6]

  References Top

1.Das Gupta BM. A note on the parasite of dermal leishmanoid. Indian Med Gaz 1927;62:11-2.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Brahmachari UN. A new form of cutaneous leishmaniasis - dermal leishmanoid. Indian Med Gaz 1923;57:1125-7.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Acton HW, Napier LE. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Indian Med Gaz 1929;64:147-8.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Sen Gupta PC, Bhattacharjee B. Histopathology of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. J Trop Med Hyg 1953;56:110-6.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]    
5.Singh RP. Observations on dermal leishmanoid in Bihar. Ind J Dermatol 1968;13:59-63.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]    
6.Ramesh V, Misra RS, Saxena U, Mukherjee A. Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: a clinical and therapeutic study. Int J Dermatol 1993;32:272-5.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]    
7.Yawalkar SJ, Mardhekar BV, Mahabir BS. Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. J Trop Med Hyg 1966;69:140-2.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]    
8.Ramesh V, Singh N. A clinical and histopathological study of macular type of post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Trop Doct 1999;29:205-7.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]    
9.Girgla HS, Maarsden RS, Singh GM, Ryan TJ. Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniais. Brit J Dermatol 1997;97:307-9.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Singh N, Ramesh V, Arora VK, Bhatia A, Kubba A, Ramam M. Nodular post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: a distinct histopathological entity. J Cutan Pathol 1998;25:95-9.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]    
11.Mukherjee A, Ramesh V, Misra RS. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: A light and electron microscopic study of 18 cases. J Cutan Pathol 1993;20:320-5.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]    


  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis and leprosy: case report and literature review
Maria Angela Bianconcini Trindade,Lana Luiza da Cruz Silva,Lucia Maria Almeida Braz,Valdir Sabbaga Amato,Bernard Naafs,Mirian Nacagami Sotto
BMC Infectious Diseases. 2015; 15(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: an unresolved mystery
Debanjan Mukhopadhyay,Jane E. Dalton,Paul M. Kaye,Mitali Chatterjee
Trends in Parasitology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Fine-needle sampling provides appreciable diagnostic yield in lesions of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis: Analysis of four cases from North Eastern India
Arghya Bandyopadhyay,Kaushik Majumdar,Mimi Gangopadhyay,Sankha Koley
Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 The Grenz Zone
Ossama Abbas,Meera Mahalingam
The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 2013; 35(1): 83
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Evaluation of serological markers to monitor the disease status of Indian post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis
Debanjan Mukhopadhyay,Nilay Kanti Das,Sritama De Sarkar,Alak Manna,Dwijendra Nath Ganguly,Joyashree Nath Barbhuiya,Arup K. Maitra,Avijit Hazra,Mitali Chatterjee
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2012; 106(11): 668
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Skin as a marker of internal disease: A case of sarcoidosis
Gautam, M., Patil, S., Munde, P.
Indian Journal of Dermatology. 2011; 56(4): 439-441
7 Foxp3 and IL-10 expression correlates with parasite burden in lesional tissues of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) patients
Katara, G.K., Ansari, N.A., Verma, S., Ramesh, V., Salotra, P.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2011; 5(5): art -e1171
8 Comparison of diagnostic methods in cutaneous leishmaniasis (histopathology compared to skin smears)
Gazozai, S.U., Iqbal, J., Bukhari, I., Bashir, S.
Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010; 23(4): 363-366
9 Unusual presentations of cutaneous leishmaniasis in clinical practice and potential challenges in diagnosis: A comprehensive analysis of literature reviews
Jombo, G.T.A., Gyoh, S.K.
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2010; 3(11): 917-921
10 Unusual presentations of cutaneous leishmaniasis in clinical practice and potential challenges in diagnosis: a comprehensive analysis of literature reviews
GTA Jombo,SK Gyoh
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2010; 3(11): 917
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Histological grading patterns in patients of cutaneous Leishmaniasis
Saleem, K., Ayaz, B., Shaikh, A.
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2007; 17(11): 650-653


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article


Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow