IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 4205 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
   Article in PDF (116 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6674    
    Printed87    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded169    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 
STUDIES
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 70  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 280-282

Mucosal and peri-orificial involvement in Post-Kala-Azar dermal leishmaniasis


Department of Dermatology & Venereology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
143, Hill Cart Road, Siliguri - 734 401, India
srathi2@rediffmail.com

   Abstract 

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lesions of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) usually affect the skin. Uncommonly, the involvement of oral and genital mucosae has been reported. METHODS: Twenty five patients clinically diagnosed as post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis were studied for periorificial and mucosal lesions. Clinical examination, skin smears and biopsy were done for the patients with periorificial or mucosal lesions. RESULTS: Out of 25 patients of PKDL, seven patients had lesions on the oral and/or genital mucosa. Three cases had oral lesions; two had only genital lesions and three patients had both sites involved. All the patients were having skin lesions elsewhere too either as nodules and/or plaque or macules. Conclusion: While examining a case of PKDL, mucosal involvement must also be examined carefully.

How to cite this article:
Rathi SK, Pandhi R K, Khanna N, Chopra P. Mucosal and peri-orificial involvement in Post-Kala-Azar dermal leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2004;70:280-2


How to cite this URL:
Rathi SK, Pandhi R K, Khanna N, Chopra P. Mucosal and peri-orificial involvement in Post-Kala-Azar dermal leishmaniasis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2019 Dec 7];70:280-2. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2004/70/5/280/12836



   Introduction Top


Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL), usually occurring 6 months to 5 years, after an attack of visceral leishmaniasis is caused by Leishmania donovani.[1] It was first described in 1922 as a distinct clinical entity.[2] Three main types of skin lesions have been described in PKDL. They are: i) hypopigmented macules ii) butterfly erythema of the face and iii) nodular lesions.[3],[4] Mucosal involvement, one of the rare types, has been described by a few workers.[4],[5],[6] We studied the mucosal and periorificial lesions in PKDL.


   Methods Top


Twenty-five patients clinically suggestive of PKDL were included for this study. The diagnosis was made clinically. Tissue smear for Leishmania donovani bodies (LDBs) and histopathological examination were done in an attempt to establish the diagnosis. Slit-skin smear for acid fast bacilli was done to rule out leprosy.

The patients were examined for various clinical lesions and for better understanding they were divided into 3 groups:

Group A: skin lesions with oral involvement

Group B: skin lesions with genital involvement

Group C: skin lesions with both oral and genital involvement


   Results Top


Out of the 25 patients, 22 were males and three were females. Their age ranged from 6 years to 55 years. Seven patients, all male, had mucosal lesions in the present study. They all demonstrated LDBs in their tissue smears. Two main types of lesions were seen; infiltrated nodules and/or plaques and hypopigmented macules. Eighteen cases presented with both types of lesions, while two cases had only macules and five presented with only nodules and/or plaque lesions.

Group A: Three patients presented with only oral mucosa involvement along with skin lesions. The tongue, lips [Figure - 1], and the hard palate were the sites affected. Two of them had lesions on the tongue and lips; the third case also showed a lesion on the hard palate [Figure - 2]. They all had infiltrated nodules.

Group B: Two cases had genital lesions only, without the involvement of oral mucosa. The sites commonly affected were the shaft of the penis [Figure - 3], and the inner surface of prepuce and glans [Figure - 4]. Erythematous plaques were observed in the shaft of the penis, while at other sites, nodules were the predominant lesions.

Group C: In two PKDL patients, both the genital and oral mucosae were involved. The lesions were distributed on the penile shaft, glans penis, lips and tongue.


   Discussion Top


Various rare morphological forms of PKDL have been documented from regions endemic for PKDL.[7],[8],[9],[10] They include mucosal, xanthomatous, verrucous, papillomatous, hypertrophic, fibroid, atrophic, extensive hypopigmentation, etc. Amongst the mucosae, lesions of PKDL usually affect the oral mucosa which shows granulomatous nodules at the angles of mouth, over the dorsum of the tongue, buccal mucosa or the soft palate.[4],[5],[6],[11] Nodules on the tongue were observed by Panja[12] and Ghosh Dastidar.[13] Ramesh, et al[6] in their 18 cases of PKDL found mucosal lesions in five patients, on the lips, tongue and palate. The inner surface of the prepuce and the glans were also involved.[6]

In our observation mucosal lesions were noted in seven (28%) patients; the lips, tongue, hard palate, inner surface of prepuce, glans and the shaft of penis were affected. All the mucosal lesions subsided after anti-leishmanial treatment.

To the best of our knowledge there is no separate study on the mucosal involvement in PKDL in the literature. The mucosa must also be looked for while examining a patient of PKDL. 

   References Top

1.Das Gupta BM. A note on the parasite of dermal leishmanoid. Indian Med Gaz 1927;62:11-2.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Brahmachari UN. A new form of cutaneous leishmaniasis-dermal leishmanoid. Indian Med Gaz 1922;57:125-7.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Napier LE, Das Gupta CR. A clinical study of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Indian Med Gaz 1930;65:249-57.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Munro DD, Du Vivier A, Jopling WH. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Br J Dermatol 1972;87:374-8.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Singh RP. Observations on dermal leishmanoid in Bihar. Indian J Dermatol 1968;13:59-63.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Ramesh V, Misra RS, Saxena U, Mukherjee A. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis: A clinical and therapeutic study. Int J Dermatol 1993;32:272-5.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Anonymous. Control of the leishmaniasis. Report of a WHO Expert Committee, Tech Rep Ser, WHO, Geneva, No. 793, 1990.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Ramesh V, Mukherjee A. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:85-91.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Rathi S, Khanna N, Pandhi RK. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis with atypical presentation. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1995;61:323.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Rathi S. Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis with an atypical presentation. J Dermatol 2001;28:341-2.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  
11.Dey NC, Kuar BK. Dermal leishmanoid in Assam. J Indian Med Assoc 1953;22:456-61.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  
12.Panja G. An unusual case of dermal leishmaniasis of the tongue. J Indian Med Assoc 1938;7:368-9.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Ghosh Dastidar SK. A rare tumour of tongue. A manifestation of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Br Med J 1939;2:14-5.  Back to cited text no. 13    

 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow