IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 621 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  NAVIGATE Here 
    Next article
    Previous article
    Table of Contents

 RESOURCE Links
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed9429    
    Printed226    
    Emailed19    
    PDF Downloaded487    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal

 

 STUDIES
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 381--385

Oral lesions in leprosy


1 Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, HUCFF-UFRJ and School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2 Department of Pathology, HUCFF-UFRJ and School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Correspondence Address:
M Silva
Rua Sorocaba 464 / 205, 22271-110 Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 17642946

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

BACKGROUND: Leprotic oral lesions are more common in the lepromatous form of leprosy, indicate a late manifestation, and have a great epidemiological importance as a source of infection. METHODS: Patients with leprosy were examined searching for oral lesions. Biopsies of the left buccal mucosa in all patients, and of oral lesions, were performed and were stained with H&E and Wade. RESULTS: Oral lesions were found in 26 patients, 11 lepromatous leprosy, 14 borderline leprosy, and one tuberculoid leprosy. Clinically 5 patients had enanthem of the anterior pillars, 3 of the uvula and 3 of the palate. Two had palatal infiltration. Viable bacilli were found in two lepromatous patients. Biopsies of the buccal mucosa showed no change or a nonspecific inflammatory infiltrate. Oral clinical alterations were present in 69% of the patients; of these 50% showed histopathological features in an area without any lesion. DISCUSSION: Our clinical and histopathological findings corroborate earlier reports that there is a reduced incidence of oral changes, which is probably due to early treatment. The maintenance of oral infection in this area can also lead to and maintain lepra reactions, while they may also act as possible infection sources. Attention should be given to oral disease in leprosy because detection and treatment of oral lesions can prevent the spread of the disease.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow