Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
Users online: 6193 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  Navigate here 
 # Next article
 # Previous article 
 # Table of Contents
 Resource links
 #  Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
 #  Article in PDF (85 KB)
 #  Citation Manager
 #  Access Statistics
 #  Reader Comments
 #  Email Alert *
 #  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
 #  Abstract
 #  References

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded307    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal

Year : 2003  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 284--286

Clinico-mycological evaluation of onychomycosis at Bangalore and Jorhat

Department of Dermatology, Air Force Hospital, Agram PO, Bangalore - 560007

Correspondence Address:
Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital (Air Force), Agram PO, Bangalore - 560007

  #  Abstract

Introduction: Clinical and mycological features of onychomycosis show variation with time and place. Material and Methods: A study to analyze the morphological variants and mycological isolates of onychomycosis was carried out in 50 patients attending the dermatology out-patient departments at the Air Force Hospitals at Bangalore and at Jorhat. Nail clippings were subjected to direct microscopy and cultured on Sabouraudís Dextrose Agar. Results: The commonest age group affected (56%) was the 20-40 year age group. The fingernails alone were involved in 24 (48%) patients, the toenails alone in 15 (30%) patients, and both in 11 (22%) patients. Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis was encountered in 41 (82%) patients, proximal superficial onychomycosis and total dystrophic onychomycosis in 3 each (6%), paronychia in 2 (4%) and superficial white onychomycosis in 1. Of the 59 samples cultured, dermatophytes were grown in 14 (23.7%), non-dermatophyte moulds (NDM) in 13 (22.0%), candida in 10 (16.8%) and no growth in 22 (37.2%) samples. Conclusion: Among the dermatophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, and among the NDM, Aspergillus spp., were the commonest isolates.

How to cite this article:
Grover S. Clinico-mycological evaluation of onychomycosis at Bangalore and Jorhat . Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:284-6

How to cite this URL:
Grover S. Clinico-mycological evaluation of onychomycosis at Bangalore and Jorhat . Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [serial online] 2003 [cited 2020 May 30];69:284-6. Available from: http://www.ijdvl.com/text.asp?2003/69/4/284/4995


Onychomycosis refers to fungal infection of the nail with various etiological agents, viz. dermatophytes, yeasts and non-dermatophyte moulds (NDM). Dermatophytes, especially Trichophyton rubrum, are most frequently implicated as its causative agents, but yeasts and NDM are increasingly recognized as etiological agents in causing primary invasion of the nail. [1],[2],[3] We undertook this study to identify the clinical pattern of this disease in our centers, isolate the most common fungal pathogens responsible and assess the role of yeast and NDM in causing onychomycosis.


Successive out-patients diagnosed clinically as having onychomycosis were included in the study conducted at the Air Force Hospitals at Bangalore and at Jorhat. A detailed history, including that of trauma, infections, occupation and personal habits, was taken. Patients with any significant medical history were excluded from the study. Nail clippings from the infected nails were collected in small black paper envelopes for easy visualization of specimens. A portion was immersed in 10% KOH overnight and examined the next morning by light microscopy. The rest was preserved in the same envelopes in order to absorb moisture and reduce or eliminate bacterial contamination. One week later, after the specimens were adequately dried of the moisture in the envelopes, they were inoculated in pairs in plain Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar (SDA) and SDA with chloramphenicol and incubated at room temperature. All cultures were examined bi-weekly for growth and incubated for four weeks before declaring them negative. Germ tube tests were performed on all growths identified as yeasts. The growths were noted for colony characteristics in the form of texture, surface color, color on the reverse, and diffusible pigment. Tease mounts, cellophane tape mounts and slide cultures were undertaken for microscopic morphology. The cultures were reported on the basis of the macroscopic and microscopic examination and germ tube tests.[4],[5]

  ::   RESULTS Top

There were a total of 50 cases consisting of 31 males and 19 females (male to female ratio = 1.63:1). The commonest age group was the 20-40 year age group, followed by the 51-60 year age group and both 41-50 and 61-70 year age groups [Table-1]. The fingernails alone were most frequently involved (48%), followed by the toenails alone (30%) and both (22%) [Table-2]. Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO) was the commonest clinical pattern (82%), followed by proximal superficial onychomycosis (PSO) and total dystrophic onychomycosis (TDO) (6% each), paronychia (4%) and superficial white onychomycosis (SWO) (2%) [Table-3].

As some of the cases had involvement of multiple sites, 59 samples were collected and cultured. Of these, dermatophytes were grown in 14 (23.7%), non-dermatophyte moulds (NDM) in 13 (22.1%), candida in 10 (16.9%) and no growth was observed in 22 (37.3%) samples. Among dermatophytes, Trichophyton rubrum was the commonest isolate (42.9%), followed by Epidermophyton floccosum (35.7%), Trichophyton tonsurans (14.3%) and Trichophyton schoenleinii (7.1%). Among the NDM, Aspergillus niger was the commonest isolate (84.6%), followed by Penicillium and Cladosporium (7.7% each). Of the 59 samples cultured, 55.9% were KOH-positive and 62.7% were culture-positive [Table-3].


All the men in our study were soldiers. We found a high incidence of onychomycosis in a younger age group which could be the result of occupation related subclinical trauma or perhaps because younger people are cosmetically more conscious than older ones. The male predominance in our study may be due to predisposing factors like occupation related subclinical trauma and use of occlusive footwear.

We found dermatophytes, especially Trichophyton rubrum, to be the most frequent etiological agents in onychomycosis, and DLSO to be the commonest morphological pattern, which has been reported earlier.[3] Though NDM are often considered as contaminants, they have been reported to colonize damaged tissues and cause secondary tissue destruction. Their role in causing cutaneous infections is not proven and a primary pathogenic role of NDM is controversial. NDM have been isolated in 2%-22% cases and yeasts in 17%-66% cases of onychomycosis in some studies.[1],[2] Our high rate (22.1%) of isolation of NDM can be explained by our climate, since a higher prevalence of NDM in onychomycosis is reported in hot and humid tropical and sub-tropical climates.[1] Some stringent criteria have been described to define NDM as a primary pathogen: (a) isolation of NDM in pure culture, (b) absence of dermatophytes, and (c) demonstration of KOH-positive filaments.[6] Using these criteria, 8 of the 13 NDM in our study (all of which are Aspergillus niger) would qualify as primary pathogens.

The KOH positivity rate varied from 35.6%-88.6% in various studies and the culture positivity rate from 36%- 53.6%.[7] Our KOH positivity rate (55.9%) fell within the reported range, but we had a comparatively high culture positivity rate (62.7%). This can be attributed to the 'drying procedure' of Milne that we followed, which reduces the rate of contamination and produces pure cultures in the isolates.[4]

To conclude, our study revealed a male preponderance, DLSO as the commonest morphological pattern, and dermatophytes as the commonest mycological isolate. It also stresses the increasing role of NDM in causing onychomycosis in recent times.  

  #   References Top

1.Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Lorenzi S. Onychomycosis caused by non-dermatophyte moulds: Clinical features and response to treatment of 59 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:217-24.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Greer DL. Evolving role of non dermatophytes in onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 1995;34:52-9.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Ramani R, Srinivas CR, Ramani A, et al. Molds in onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 1993;32:877-8.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Milne LJR. Fungi. In: Collee JC, Duguid JP, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, editors. Practical medical microbiology. 13th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1989. p. 676-7.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckberger PC, Winn WC. Color atlas and textbook of microbiology (Mycology). 5th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1997. p. 983-1053.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.English MP. Nails and fungi. Br J Dermatol 1976;94:697-701.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Mohanty JC, Mohanty SK, Sahoo RC, et al. Diagnosis of superficial mycoses by direct microscopy- a statistical evaluation. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1999;65:72-4.  Back to cited text no. 7    


Print this article  Email this article


Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow