IADVL
Indexed with PubMed and Science Citation Index (E) 
 
Users online: 3606 
     Home | Feedback | Login 
About Current Issue Archive Ahead of print Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe What's New Contact  
  NAVIGATE Here 
    Next article
    Previous article
    Table of Contents

 RESOURCE Links
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed132    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
Year : 2001  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 135--137

A double - blind randomised multicentre controlled study of topical 0.05% clobetasol propionate with 2.5% zinc sulphate preparation


1 Department of Dermatology, Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur 613004, India
2 Department of Dermatology, Batra Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Dermatology, Mumbai, India
4 St John's Medical College, Bangalore, India
5 Medical College Hospital, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Correspondence Address:
Jayakar Thomas
Department of Dermatology, Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur 613004
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 28615568

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The aim of this study was to compre the efficacy and safety of topical clobetasol propionate and clobetasol propionate with zinc sulphate cream preparation. Steroid responsive dermatoses were primarily considered in both the treatment groups. From thc analysis of 291 patients, from five different centres, it wasnoted that though the out come was Positive in both the trial groups significant differences existed in the treatment group which received clobetasol propionate with zinc sulphate preparation. During evaluation the outcome was even between both treatment groups on the day 7. However towards the end of the study significant differences existed. Interestingly both the treatment groups did not have any adverse effects.






[PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Online since 15th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow